MINUTES OF MEETING TURTLE RUN
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT

A regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the Turtle Run Community Development District was held on Monday, March 30, 2026 at 6:00 p.m. at the Coral Bay Recreation Center, 3101 South Bay Drive, Margate, Florida.

Present and constituting a quorum:
Barry Winfree	Chairman
Skip Carney	Vice Chairman
Virginia Tropea	Assistant Secretary
Kenneth Murray	Assistant Secretary
Rob Shipe	Assistant Secretary Also present were:
Patrick Burgess	District Manager
Jason Gitel	GMS (via telecommunication)
Pat Szozda	GMS
Scott Cochran	District Counsel
Jonathan Geiger	District Engineer

Segment I:
FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS	Roll Call
Mr. Burgess called the meeting to order and called the roll.

SECOND ORDER OF BUSINESS	Moment of Silence
Mr. Winfree led a moment of silence.
THIRD ORDER OF BUSINESS	Pledge of Allegiance
Mr. Winfree led the Pledge of Allegiance.
FOURTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Good News
Mr. Winfree: Skip do you have anything? Mr. Carney: It is all good, thank you.

Mr. Winfree: I will state the obvious. We finally got some rain and that the leave are finally abating so we can get especially from my development cleaned up because it is black. Ken anything?
Mr. Murray: I am good. Mr. Winfree: Rob?
Mr. Shipe: Nope, not today. Mr. Winfree: Ginny?
Ms. Tropea: Good as well.

FIFTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Approval of the Minutes of the
February 23, 2026 Meeting
Mr. Winfree: We have the approval of the minutes of the meeting from February 23, 2026. Can I get a motion?

On MOTION by Ms. Tropea seconded by Mr. Murray with all in favor, the Minutes of the February 23, 2026 Meeting were approved.

SIXTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Staff Reports
Attorney
Mr. Winfree: Staff reports, Mr. Attorney do you have anything?
Mr. Cochran: I don’t have anything to report tonight.
Engineer – Proposal with Landshore Enterprises for Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan for the Avana Apartments
Mr. Winfree: We are going to jump into talking about the proposal for Landshore
first.
Mr. Geiger: This is going to be in reference to the work we are doing at Avana.
They are requesting an additional $2,800. If the Board remembers we paid them, the original contract was to regrade the slope and to address the pipe. There was some change orders for I believe the dredging for the pipe, right Patrick?
Mr. Burgess: Yes.
Mr. Geiger: Then some design work to do with that. I believe this proposal is for them to furnish engineering plans to remediate the slope that is underwater the stuff that we weren’t addressing before because we didn’t know where the pipe was or what it was

going to take. Now that they have found the pipe and they have done some of the work with that they would like to put together a set of plans and everything to address the area that is under water whether we are going to extend the pipe out or they are going to be able to cut that slope back. This is basically to determine that. The pipe that is out there now is still uncovered but it is sitting in the slope to where we just can’t leave it like that. This is to give them the information and anything they are going to need to provide us the service to fix that pipe. Patrick does this include the CCTV stuff? It might be outside of that. They wanted to put the camera down the pipe. I believe we were waiting on them to get a subconsultant agreement with somebody. I don’t think that is included in this. I know the last email we had from them I think they said that would be provided under separate pricing. This is for the engineering work basically to address the stuff that we weren’t before we needed to address.
Mr. Winfree: Are you saying the end of the pipe? We can’t just leave it where it is I think I heard you say because it is within the 8 feet.
Mr. Geiger: It was buried. He said they could not work where the pipe is now, I don’t think they can work with the slopes around it. He will be able to determine if they can cut the slopes back with this work. I think when I spoke with them is their first thought was they are going to have to do something with it.
Mr. Winfree: There is no concrete, no there is no headwall or anything.
Mr. Geiger: There is a piece of concrete but not like a traditional headwall it was something just to hold the end of that pipe in place under water. Like I said what they are giving us is basically the cost for them to come up and say this is how we would like to address this.
Mr. Winfree: Is it to the permit? Did it get in per the permit, and it is not where it should be? Or we don’t know yet?
Mr. Geiger: I don’t know. I believe we did ask for that information. I don’t know if they didn’t have it at the time. We met with them a couple of weeks ago to discuss this. I did pose the question. I asked them if they could give us the length of pipe as they have recorded from the catch basin into the lake. That way we know if it is 190 linear feet on the permit or on the as-builts and it is 190 feet. Regardless it is still our responsibility to

fix. I don’t know if it wasn’t built to the way the permit was I don’t know what kind of recourse the District is going to have with it.
Mr. Burgess: From their measurement he said that they are measuring approximately 160 linear feet where the plans show 190.
Mr. Winfree: That is where we came up with whether it should be 40 feet out into the lake because it is not even ten feet out.
Mr. Burgess: It is kind of the issue is why it eroded where it did was because it the pipe was basically ending at the shoreline where it should have been out at least more.
Mr. Geiger: This could have been a change made at the direction of the engineer at the time, and it didn’t end up in the permit documents. These documents are really old and often what I get a hold of is not the complete story. It is here the as-builts and here is a permit but none of the in between correspondences. There is a lot of times where I don’t have the whole picture. I get the one sheet out of the plans, and I am looking at a number that does not match what is going on out there. That would clarify if we add that additional 30 feet this thing would not be in the side slope it would be much further out.
Mr. Winfree: This is strictly plan for plan what is going to be done.
Mr. Geiger: This still coincides with the original scope of work for them to actually regrade everything that was deficient for South Florida, the stuff about the water. This is more to deal with the underwater at the pipe. The original scope of work was to fix the actual shoreline.
Mr. Winfree: Any other questions?
Mr. Carney: This is a contract or an agreement we are going to have to sign tonight.
Mr. Cochran: What we did is we had the original agreement with the scope of work for the regrading. There was another agreement that we did that was kind of a separate thing that wasn’t really part of the original scope of work. We did that as a change order. When we did it the first time we did it as an amendment to the agreement. What I would probably look to do is make this an exhibit to a second amendment to the agreement if the Board is so inclined. It is really for them to do the original scope of work it is just based on this pipe situation.
Mr. Geiger: This is more of a professional service thing. The other one was a construction agreement. If we could amend it that way.

Mr. Carney: And Scott you are reviewing all these contracts correct?
Mr. Cochran: I am reviewing the proposal and then I prepare the contract document.
Mr. Burgess: They are proposing $2,800 to do the engineering work.
Mr. Winfree: Any other questions? Do I have a motion to approve the proposal for the erosion and sedimentation control for the apartments?
Mr. Burgess: It would be a motion to approve the proposal from Landshore Enterprises for erosion and sedimentation control plans for the Avana Apartments location pipe outfall.

On MOTION by Mr. Carney seconded by Mr. Murray with all in favor, a proposal in the amount of $2,800 with Landshore Enterprises for Erosion and Sedimentation Control for the Avana Apartments Location Pipe Outfall was approved.

Mr. Winfree: I am not sure if you want to talk anymore or save you to the end.
Mr. Geiger: We can just talk about some more of this stuff now. Friday we did meet with South Florida Water Management and Landshore virtually to discuss the options that we showed the Board last time around for the remediation. Right off the bat South Florida was not the most in favor of putting additional tubes out there to fix what is going on for these lakes. Part of their issue is even though Landshore has told that they have done this before through South Florida their criteria the maximum step down you can have is 8 inches. They prefer us to have a smooth 4:1 but they did after talking with them and them realizing 10,000 linear feet of shoreline that is a lot. They know it is a cost burden to the District. They are willing to work with us on the geo-tubes putting additional tubes in if we do that route, but they would like us to ensure that the step downs are as small as possible. I don’t know at this point, Patrick, have you talked to Miquel about a revision and cost for the eco-tube? At this time I don’t know if he is going to have to put more tubes in to accomplish what they are looking for with that system to do phase 1 or if this going to be something we are going to have to go back to the drawing board with maybe a new idea. As of now he is showing 9 inch step downs. That is way too big. They said 8 is the

max but they would like to see that as flat as possible. I don’t know if they are going to have to install maybe a fourth tube and make smaller step downs.
Mr. Burgess: Landshore said they couldn’t go much further. I said how much further can you guys do the step down or smaller and he said we really don’t have much room. He said as far as what we could financially this is definitely an option they have done before. They really feel that this is the appropriate work that would be way better than what is currently there.
Mr. Geiger: Miquel argued these points with South Florida. I guess he clarified to Patrick that is about the smallest they could get those. I know South Florida basically told us that was not going to be acceptable to them. They kind of recommended, they said they have had communities do this where they get out there with a box blade and just grade everything back in the dry season. We are unfortunately not in the dry season right now. I don’t know how high these lakes are, but I don’t think we have the room to get up there. Miquel didn’t seem to think that was an option.
Mr. Burgess: We don’t have a lot of room to begin with. A lot of these areas are dropped off with a very steep drop. There is not a lot of room to begin with.
Mr. Geiger: We are trying to go back and forth with South Florida because I don’t want the District to sign a contract or put something out to bid for a product that South Florida is not going to approve in the end even though we don’t need a permit with them which I really wish they would just make us pull a permit because then we would have some form to do approvals. They are kind of putting the ownness on the District to get it corrected but don’t do it the wrong way. I want to say this was almost a million dollars to do this.
Mr. Burgess: Yes this was the cheapest.
Mr. Geiger: The next one up which the District would approve because it is a 4:1 was $1.7 million dollars at the minimum. There may be other methods. South Florida mentioned just pinning fabric back kind of like a tube like the concrete mat but more of just geo-textile. Landshore said they have done that in the past and it just does not perform well. You still get erosion. I don’t know if there is other products out there that they could recommend. The last thing we got today was they sent something over about requesting if the District wanted us to do a Mr. Geiger was inaudible at this time. I don’t

think that the Board was entertaining the rip rap, the lime rock at all. If this isn’t going to be acceptable to South Florida because they want $20,000 to put each of these methods in and I don’t see the reason to put something in if South Florida is not going to go for it. Why are we going to spend money to update something? I haven’t spoken to Miquel since we spoke last Friday.
Mr. Burgess: This is the option that we are able to do this year with the funds available. The next step is we really have to figure out how we are going to finance those options. It is kind of unfortunate because we are asking South Florida Water Management District what they recommend, what we can do, and they are just like we will just come check it out when you guys complete the job.
Mr. Winfree: It is a little too late.
Mr. Burgess: It is really up to whoever we hire as a lake bank restoration company with the help of Jonathan’s firm and whatever the Board feels they want to do. That is what they are telling us. It is up to us.
Mr. Winfree: Are we doing something very similar to this in another District by Landshore?
Mr. Geiger: Their permit is with Broward County from what I understand, not South Florida.
Mr. Winfree: Are they doing nine or less or the same?
Mr. Geiger: It is a different permitting agency so they might allow this when South Florida doesn’t. I would have to look at their permit to our permit. He pulled the permit and it does state 4:1 to 2 feet. I don’t know how this other permit reads. We did discuss with South Florida also hey look we have to split phase 1 into two phases because of the financials. They are going to work with us. They would like us to update things as we are going. If we have to do one lake instead of two to get something done. They would like to see us start. They know we are still dealing with the Avana stuff, and they know this is a high ticket item. This is not cheap to get in here and do this kind of work. Another thing we discussed was maybe pushing phase 1 into two phases just so this year we can get a start on something and then look at what it is going to cost moving forward.
Mr. Burgess: They are very lenient with us showing good faith that we are starting something. I think the last thing the District wants to do is do something that is going to

require a shorter amount of time then we want to do this project or put the wrong product in. We are kind of crunched with time. We have a short amount of time before we have to adopt the next fiscal year budget to know what we are going to budget for the next phase. There is just a lot of moving parts. At least they are lenient with us on the time right now as long as we are showing good faith, but it is just not clear what direction we are going to go because at the end of the day Landshore can help us all they want but we still have to go out to public bid and do that process. We haven’t approved them to do anything, but they have been the most helpful with showing us multiple options. We have worked with them, so we know they are good, but we still have to find vendors.
Mr. Winfree: The most capable. That is the biggest issue is finding actual people, it is nice that somebody says they can do it.
Mr. Geiger: That is what one of my project managers discussed with me was even when we put this out to bid if we just put it out to bid with generic specifications we are probably going to get brand name for one contractor is different from a brand name from another but at the end of the day if we put the block mat in you are putting the block mat in. If you put the geo-tube in you are putting the geo-tube in. I am not sure what pricing flexibility with a capable contractor we are going to get. You can get someone who maybe hasn’t done this, low ball it and it could be a disaster. I do not want someone out there putting something in that South Florida is going to come out and look at and say that doesn’t meet our specifications.
Mr. Shipe: If we go with the Mr. Shipe was inaudible at this time. that they fill and sod over the top of it so that you don’t actually see it like it washed out now.
Mr. Geiger: The top will be covered. The stuff under water they do not. Like I said Patrick spoke to Miguel and they can’t get that step down less than 9 inches the District is not going to allow it. They said their maximum was 8 inches, but he said if we were going to put this in these would need to be as small as possible.
Mr. Burgess: They want a smooth 4:1 transition and that is really not going to be achieved with this method so you can go to the next method and then we run into financial issues to get it done this year as we planned.
Mr. Geiger: Landshore doesn’t think and I don’t think there is a way to get in there and do this in the traditional methods. It is a huge lake. You really don’t have a lot of

places to put the water. Even then you are ripping up the existing tubes, you have to get equipment back there.
Mr. Shipe: What lake are we actually speaking about doing first?
Mr. Geiger: What I am calling 11 and 12 the two that are in the Estates and Hidden Lake wrap around them. The two northern lakes that are behind all the homes and everything.
Mr. Shipe: Those are the bigger lakes.
Mr. Geiger: Yes. If we had to split them into two phases I would probably start with the one over across from Forest Glen the smaller of the two to try make sure that what we are going to do is actually going to work before we release them on a lake that is twice the size.
Mr. Shipe: Can we also think about doing it in two different methods. Maybe the bigger lakes like 11 it is bigger so it gets more when the wind blows so that blocking might be a better surface to resist the waves and then on the smaller lakes the geo-tubes.
Mr. Geiger: The ones under the power lines we are probably going to be able to do a traditional grading, not even have to put anything robust in. I think Landshore did indicate that the block mats are probably the most stable solution minus the rip rap, but I think we are beyond putting in a bunch of lime rock out there. With the block mat too I know that you can plant on top of it. I do know that we spoke with South Florida, and they said they might be able to relax the planting requirement if the material is designed to basically prevent that erosion under water which the planting does. That is the one that they said is the most resistant minus the rip rap out of the up and down with the water levels fluctuating especially with the droughts that we have been going through the last couple of years. Even South Florida said the lakes that get the east west winds are probably in the worst shape and everything because of the way the wave action occurs.
Mr. Shipe: I understand that it is expensive, but I am more in favor of especially the lakes where there is homes are using the mat.
Mr. Burgess: I think what we can try to do is if we want to get information about the block mat we can talk to the accountant to see what additional funds we need to do it and how we could obtain those during this fiscal year and then replenish them with the next budget. There is a lot that she is ready to help with, but we just don’t have numbers. We

have the general numbers based on the linear foot per plan, but we don’t have any direction saying we are going to obtain proposals and it going to cost around this much.
Mr. Shipe: Also we are going to have to decide whether it is mail or just get in touch with property owner along there. Some of the lakes it is ten feet from their pool to there. With the equipment there is going to be a lot into the easement and a lot of work in people’s back yards and things like that. I don’t know how we are going to get the word out to the people.
Mr. Burgess: Whatever we decide we will stay in our easement.
Mr. Geiger: Landshore said a lot of this work that we are looking at would probably be done from a barge. They said it is a little bit more costly but then he was looking at behind some of these homes and instead of having to cut down trees and replace sod and people’s irrigation and it is also going to depend on the method. He said the geo-tube method is really easy for them to do from a barge. I am not sure about the other one. They did send over a proposal for an engineering study for the first phase where they said they would be able to give us a more tied down price based on them actually getting out and looking at the site conditions, taking some survey stuff. Actually it is basically what we just approved for the Avana but for those two lakes. It was like $27,000 originally. I have gone back and forth with them. The District has already paid for a survey so there is no need for them to survey everything. I believe he knocked it down to $21,000 but that is still a hefty price for engineering work before we are sure what we are doing.
Mr. Shipe: If we put this out to bid are we going to have to pay each company that
$20,000 to do engineering work?
Mr. Geiger: My belief is when we put this out to bid I would have that included in the language what we are going to do. I want plans prepared. When we talked with Landshore they said even if the District goes ahead and pays for this and we don’t get the bid they can still give us the specifications and recommendations that we can use to put it out to bid. I think we are leaning towards trying to use Landshore unless there is something that dictates there is a better company with a better price and better product, but Landshore has been super supportive and really trying to help us out here. It is a lot of money just to spend, and this gets delayed another two months before we can put something out to bid.

Mr. Winfree: Let me see if I can summarize a few things and maybe come up with a path to move forward. Can you put the rocks up there? I don’t think anyone is in favor of that. To me it does not look conducive aesthetically or safety wise of having rocks like that in my back yard. I certainly wouldn’t want that especially if I had kids and they are out. I would rather take chances with water then those rocks to tell you the truth. I would say we put that one off to the side. Agreed?
Ms. Tropea: Agreed.
Mr. Winfree: The next two are the two that we have to think on. Going to the mat I can’t quite Invision what that is. I didn’t quite understand it. Is that a mat down and that a float out there?
Mr. Geiger: The block mat is essentially that filter fabric but with little, tiny pyramid blocks on top of it. It is like a weighted mat that holds everything down. They would get in there and install it underwater and back fill it, I believe it is the same that they would use with the tubes where they are just dredging and backfilling.
Mr. Winfree: I am assuming that kind of helps with the erosion and we can actually plant on that. I am assuming we are going to have to put something on it.
Mr. Geiger: It is like a weighted blanket for the shoreline almost. They said you can plant on it.
Mr. Winfree: Now I understand. Everything I read it said they want to see the planting there.
Mr. Geiger: Unless they relax it based on product specifications. We could save a couple hundred thousand dollars not planting grass and stuff that is probably going to die underwater.
Mr. Carney: Well it does. What happens is you put the grass on top and the water comes, it dies. It is not here for two years, it is gone.
Mr. Winfree: Can we get back to the first one where it has the geo-tubes on it?
Mr. Carney: The original installation was done from the easement and from the lake. Nobody had to come between houses. That was the original installation.
Mr. Winfree: Go to the one that you had up there with the nine inch step down.
The blue line is.
Mr. Geiger: That blue line that is just them showing the water control elevation.

Mr. Winfree: When we built this how did we build it from? Like right now we are down three feet. That is half of our drop right. Where do we start this from?
Mr. Geiger: They would have to go I would say set the bottom tube and built their way back up. I don’t know. I haven’t gotten into specifics as to how this is to be constructed. We are just trying to figure out what is actually going to work to satisfy them.
Mr. Carney: Is that three tubes on top of the existing tube?
Mr. Geiger: Yes. That is redressing the existing tubes. If South Florida would let us do this that would be great, but it doesn’t seem based on their indication that if they can’t get that step down any smaller South Florida is not going to sign off on it.
Mr. Winfree: Here is my next step sort of speak there has to be some way I can’t believe nine inches is the best they can do. Maybe I am wrong but I thinking more in the 6 to 8 range and driving it over the 8 feet. You have to get your four steps like you were talking about earlier rather than three.
Mr. Geiger: I haven’t had a chance to speak to Landshore but if they said we can get it down to 6 to 8 inches, but we have to add two more geo-tubes but now we up in the
$1.7 million dollar range.
Mr. Winfree: That is where I am heading. What would it take for that and what would the cost be and is it worthwhile? Which would be the better because are already up to that cost. Why wouldn’t we go with more proven product then trying to do four or five stepdowns and the geo-tube again.
Mr. Geiger: That is going to be my question to work with Landshore here maybe ask this week to see if it is accomplishable and how much more expensive is this going to be.
Mr. Winfree: So we can compare apples to apples of what really needs to get down.
If that is not feasible, ok.
Mr. Geiger: They are not necessarily saying no.
Mr. Winfree: I don’t like that, let’s start something and see if they are going to pass
it.
Mr. Geiger: I would much rather them have something that says we accept that is
what the District is doing.

Mr. Winfree: And that is what we are all going to sign. We might not need a permit, but I would like an official agreement on it. My suggestion is we see what we can do on the geo-tubes and what the cost would be for that. If that matches the same thing this is out. Are they only three real major ways of doing this or is there a fourth or a fifth?
Mr. Geiger: There is probably other ways. These are the ones that they have evaluated as being the most viable. Like I said they said you could just pin some fabric back instead of doing the block mat, but they said from what they have seen out here and with the wave action and what we are experiencing that is not going to be a long term solution. Then we are back out there every five to ten years reinstalling geo-textile material and refilling eroded slopes and everything.
Mr. Winfree: Ok. So we are saying basically this is out, this would be if we can’t get that to a manageable, agreeable with South Florida and money-wise to us. Does that make sense? Anybody else have any other ideas or what else to do? I know I would say no to this, and it is just between these two if we can get that to work for a price.
Mr. Geiger: Correct.
Mr. Murray: I think it is too risky to go with this. Too risky that South Florida is going to accept it once we start.
Mr. Winfree: For nine inches no way but if they can get it down to the six for a reasonable price.
Mr. Geiger: If they can get it down to where they think they can do it I would still probably want them to install some sort of test section and have South Florida come out. I know the block mat that is a no brainer. It is a smooth slope, it is what South Florida wants. I don’t want them to install 2,000 linear of this and have a smaller step and South Florida still comes out say no.
Mr. Winfree: I agree.
Mr. Carney: Did you say earlier that they FPL lake would just need excavation?
Mr. Geiger: Those are small enough. I haven’t even gotten into checking those lakes on the survey yet because we have been so focused on Avana. Even if we do have to do any spot work out there we can put one of those lakes, plug it, pump it and regrade it. I don’t think we are going to need any geo-tubes or any specialty products. They are also small enough to work every five or ten years. It is the houses and residents that

South Florida is mostly concerned with right now even on the call they said they are appreciating us focusing on these areas and they do understand that we might need split this up because of the finances.
Mr. Carney: It is the bigger lakes that are a real issue.
Mr. Winfree: They get the bigger waves, bigger erosion and everything. Those ones under the FPL don’t get that much wind to begin with. I don’t think we are going to do a motion on this or anything. I think you have a direction. The only thing I will also say is if this gets up to ¾ or 80% is it worthwhile to say that is going to cost us more probably in the future with maintenance then the overall cost is going to be more expensive if we get up to 2/3 or 3/4 of the price. If it is not half price and a little bit of maintenance fine but if we start getting up to 2/3 or 3/4 it is going to start costing us more to maintain it then if we just went ahead and did the other.
Mr. Geiger: Correct and that is I think South Florida’s point is if we can get those steps down to were a little bit of erosion on top of them doesn’t matter because we are not creating a there is like a foot drop off on some of those tubes right now. We have asked for longevity information on these products. I think they were waiting for us to speak with South Florida because I don’t think they want to give us all this product information for something the District is not entertaining. That can be a follow up with Miguel as well. A revised cost or if they could get this system to work.
Mr. Winfree: What is the additional cost and what is the long term additional cost.
Mr. Geiger: The good thing with any of these systems is they said they can work in the wet season, so this isn’t it has to be dry. Once we do get something on the books started they said they could just contain on minus extreme rain events or hurricanes. I did doublecheck with the public works person in Coral Springs, and the city engineer and we do not need to go through the city for this. They said this is South Florida’s business and it was installed under that permit. It is on private property. He said let us know what you are going to do but we are not going to be required to go through the City of Coral Springs for formal permits. The same reason South Florida doesn’t want to issue a permit for this type of work.

Mr. Winfree: Any other questions, concerns or comments? The only other question I have is we have spent a lot of time on this one. Giving the direction we just gave you can we move a little quicker now or get some answers?
Mr. Geiger: This is due the fact that the Board only meets once a month. There was five weeks between the meeting this time. I spoke with Patrick it might be a good idea to maybe set a special meeting to discuss this outside a normal Board meeting. If Landshore comes back instead of waiting till the end of April to speak with the Board again these proposals are up in hundreds of thousands of dollars. KCI is going to start working on the front end of the specs to put out once we agree on the system. When we do put this out to bid then we will already have that put together.
Mr. Winfree: We are four weeks away from our next meeting correct? Is it worthwhile to put something in between that four weeks right now? Do you think you would have something back that fast or do we wait till the next one and then we have two weeks to decide something from there. It is more of how much questions are you going to be able to answer in the next two to four weeks.
Mr. Geiger: For me and Patrick sometimes it is slow to get information. It is real slow from South Florida to get back to us. Thank God they did before this meeting. We can start putting together everything we can. At this point we want to make sure if we are going to put this out to bid the Board has a chance to yes that is what we are looking for, and just give you guys a heads up on costs.
Mr. Carney: Why don’t you communicate with Patrick and Patrick can call a special meeting if need be.
Mr. Burgess: It would most likely be at GMS because Coral Bay is always booked with their HOA meetings. It is a little more difficult to coordinate with them. GMS is typically always open in the evening.
Mr. Winfree: How far in advance of the notice do we have to put. Don’t we have to advertise this?
Mr. Cochran: Legally it is seven days, but you need to allow a couple of days to get it published from when GMS submits it to the publisher so ten days.
Mr. Winfree: So with the direction we just gave you tomorrow can you get back to Landshore and say this is what we need and we need it quickly so we can discuss it.

Mr. Geiger: Tomorrow I will get with Patrick and we can call Miguel. Step one is can you make the tubes work within South Florida’s guidelines not can you install them with nine inches and hope that South Florida says yes. If it is feasible what is the revised cost? I think at that point Patrick and I can probably make a decision on ok it is an extra
$200,000 not an extra $500,000 let’s look at that. If we need anymore or something approved faster so we can put something out to bid.
Mr. Winfree: The faster we can move this at this point for as long as we have been working on this. I think we have a better understanding now. We have the survey done. Do we want to entertain at this point, did they give us a formal proposal to do the study that we can use going forward or not?
Mr. Geiger: For the first phase yes we do have a proposal for $22,000. This would be to do the engineering study for the phase 1 lakes. This was with the eco-tube I think.
Mr. Burgess: Yes.
Mr. Winfree: That is only based on why would it be different? Doesn’t make any sense to me.
Mr. Geiger: I think you are right. I don’t think it is going to matter because the soil characteristics aren’t going to change depending on the process. Measuring and sampling of the soil, testing, analysis, and set of design drawings for the phase 1 stuff.
Mr. Winfree: I heard somebody say something about a 20 foot section or test section. That doesn’t include that right?
Mr. Geiger: No. This is an engineering services proposal.
Mr. Winfree: That would benefit us no matter who we are looking for, right? It is not a onetime throw away cost.
Mr. Geiger: What would happen with this if we did this before we put this out to bid? They would furnish us a report and a set of plans and I would attach that to the bid process.
Mr. Winfree: That is the project.
Mr. Geiger: That is what we are doing. Mr. Winfree: That makes sense to me.
Mr. Geiger: This will delay a notice to contractor by a couple of months. This is not something they are going to be able to do right away. I don’t know the time frame he gave

us originally, but I know they last one they did for me that was smaller than this it took them about a month to get.
Mr. Winfree: The first thing we need to do is the feasibility can they do what they were doing. They still have to do this other no matter what process I will call it or what type.
Mr. Geiger: I feel like if we don’t through with their stand along engineering proposal they are going to wind up building this cost into the work if we go out to bid. They need to do their own footwork to be able to install their system. I don’t think they are just going to go out there and start digging and putting things in the ground.
Mr. Winfree: You are saying to do that it is going to be four to eight weeks?
Mr. Geiger: I have to look at what the time frame was in here, but I know they are not going to get out there tomorrow. We can ask Miguel that as well this week and see.
Mr. Winfree: Alright let’s put it this way. Maybe this is the process you guys do what you can do and if you do need something from us you have that seven to ten days no matter where we are if it is holding us up do a special meeting. Make sense? This is dragging out in my opinion for quite a while, and I think we are getting close.
Mr. Burgess: If we are going to have a special meeting in April it is going to be the 13th or 14th that makes the most sense as far as time between having this meeting and the next meeting.
Mr. Winfree: I don’t want to call a special meeting for nothing.
Mr. Geiger: It would be to get an approval. Otherwise Patrick can submit the information to you guys outside of a meeting for stuff we don’t need to take action on right this very minute.
Mr. Burgess: We will know by the end of this week if we need to call a special meeting.
Mr. Winfree: If they are telling us they can do this other and this is what it is going to cost now then I think we need a meeting to say yes let’s go forward. Should we put a motion to do that study now and get it started?
Mr. Geiger: That is going to be up to the Board. Mr. Winfree: What is the recommendation?

Mr. Geiger: I think it is something where if we didn’t do it now Landshore is going to wind up building that cost into.
Mr. Winfree: I would rather have a stand set of specs.
Mr. Geiger: It would then give them the direction to figure out what is going to work and put it on paper. Then we are not going back and forth with the Board. We are going this is what we are doing now.
Mr. Winfree: What do you think guys? Do it now and get that started? Mr. Shipe: Yes.
Mr. Geiger: Part of the reason they wanted to do this study to is, if we are using Landshore they will have a better idea of the unforeseen stuff.
Mr. Winfree: You look at the little fifty feet at Avana, and it has taken us a year and here we are talking about a much bigger much more different lake that we are looking at.
Mr. Geiger: This might be something to where they said that they might be able to look at this from their engineering perspective doing this work and maybe not just do one product for the whole shoreline. There might be something that might be more appropriate to where we have headwalls as opposed to just running with one product.
Mr. Winfree: Exactly.
Mr. Burgess: Just because we are getting limited on time this for the $22,000 proposal from Landshore to provide an erosion and sedimentation control plan for lakes 11 and 12. Is there a motion to approve that?

On MOTION by Mr. Carney seconded by Mr. Murray with all in favor, a proposal from Lakeshore Enterprises in the amount of $22,000 for the Erosion Control Plan Study for Phase 1 was approved.

Field Manager – Annual Maintenance Plan
Mr. Szozda: I will be brief. As far as iguana removal mother nature took care of that. We had a major kill of iguanas. Unfortunately it killed a bunch of peacock bass too. We had that all cleaned up and hats off to Southeast they came in for five days and cleaned up dead fish. It was pretty disgusting. They did a great job though. Complete

fertilization of the property was completed last week. The rotation of the annuals was completed today. That is what I have.
Mr. Carney: The iguanas that survived where the ones that live near the homes.
They are all over the roofs.
Mr. Szozda: I cleaned up a bunch by the park under the powerlines. Mr. Carney: Over by houses they are all over the roofs.
Mr. Winfree: There are more on the roofs now then they were. Mr. Szozda: It is nice and warm up there.
Mr. Winfree: Anything else?
Mr. Szozda: One other thing there has been a complete Mr. Szozda was inaudible at this time. done of the property which has been years in the making. That is complete.
Mr. Winfree: We pass?
Mr. Szozda: Believe it or not everything is really good out there. Mr. Winfree: Manager.
Manager
Progress Report
Proposal with Industrial Divers Corp for Repairs from the Annual Inspection
Mr. Burgess: Do you want me to go through any items specifically on the progress report? I don’t want to take too much time. The biggest update I have is the fence on Turtle Creek Drive that was hit by a car was repaired and we are just working on getting the reimbursement for that. The city has reached out to us. The police officer on site did get our information in order to get reimbursement. It is a very minor cost. The Estates speed limit pole is being shipped to Horsepower on the 16th of this month. As soon as I hear from them that they received it we will get an install date. That is one item off the list as far as light poles and sign poles. That is all I have unless you have any questions on the progress report. Not hearing any just really quick I do need final approval on the holiday lighting final invoice. There was a few items added that we felt were necessary in order to have the property looking the best. It was in the amount of $1,118.20 over the agreed upon amount. There was a few areas that were lacking light like Terrapin Lane the Christmas palm fronds didn’t have any lights and looked a lot better having lights. We

need final approval on that invoice. We will get it paid and then we will be prepared for the next fiscal years lighting. Is there a motion on the final invoice with holiday lighting?

On MOTION by Mr. Carney seconded by Mr. Murray with all in favor, a proposal in the amount of $1,118.20 for the final invoice with holiday lighting was approved.

Mr. Burgess: The proposal with Industrial Divers on page 44 of the agenda is basically your inspection was completed. There was not any areas of major concern. The recommended maintenance is just a few areas of cleaning at $9,500 for site 3 and site
15. He said it doesn’t need to be done this year, but I think if it is showing and recommends it we might as well knock it out and have less work required next year. It is up to the Board. It is not absolutely necessary, but we can get it cleaned and it will only help. That is why I added the proposal in here for you guys to consider.
Mr. Winfree: Site 15 is that for that pipe that goes over to PetSmart or is that where it interconnects and comes south.
Mr. Burgess: It would be the west side right where the arrow is on the right side on the map.
Mr. Winfree: So it is ours even though it’s PetSmart’s lake it is still our outfall. Mr. Burgess: Correct. We won’t be doing anything that is not CDD property.
Mr. Winfree: Sounds good. Any questions on that? Can I get a motion for Industrial Divers?

On MOTION by Mr. Murray seconded by Mr. Carney with all in favor, a proposal in the amount of $9,500 with Industrial Divers for repairs from the annual inspection was approved.

Mr. Burgess: Alright, I will get that scheduled. Really quick we have a request from a homeowner in the Estates they are wanting to complete the back part of their fence and they sent us plans. It doesn’t identify the lake bank easement, but Jonathan said based on his research they would be building into our easement. I just wanted approval or

direction stating that is not allowed in the past and we wouldn’t allow anything to be built. It has to be outside of our easement.
Mr. Winfree: Correct.
Mr. Burgess: That was our understanding. I just wanted to doublecheck.
Mr. Winfree: If that is what we have done in the past I don’t see why we would change it.
Mr. Burgess: Ok. We will know that direction moving forward. That is all I have.

SEVENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Financial Reports
Approval of Check Register
Approval of Unaudited Financials
Mr. Winfree: Next item is the approval of the check register.

On MOTION by Mr. Shipe seconded by Mr. Murray with all in favor, the Check Register was approved.

EIGHTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Public Comments
Mr. Winfree: We don’t have any public comments. There is no public hear today.
NINTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Supervisors Requests
Mr. Winfree: Supervisor requests?
Mr. Carney: Just really quick. You can see in the park the pavilion is in. The irrigation is in. It is all sodded. It looks pretty nice. The play set is done. Social area with the exercise equipment is completed. Hardwood park benches and the restroom if you haven’t been there you need to look inside. It looks really nice. It is tiled to the ceiling. It looks like a first class restroom, not a truck stop restroom. The roof replacement for the restrooms is in the 2026 budget for the city. The sports field is completed. The basketball courts are going into the 2026 budget for the city which will be closer to the school. Pickleball courts and tennis courts are complete and also for the 2026 will be the surveillance cameras in all parks now in the City of Coral Springs. The parking lot resurfacing hopefully they will get that in the budget also. After that it is done.
Mr. Shipe: Are they going to put BBQ pits at the pavilion? I didn’t see any in there.

Mr. Carney: Good question. I don’t know. Pat we have to close the gate a little bit.
You have to put up the fence rail posting so they don’t drive in?
Mr. Szozda: They were working on that actually. Mr. Carney: They just stopped it where they were.
Mr. Szozda: I will have to touch base with them on that.
Mr. Carney: I talked about it once with Rob Hunter the parks director, and he said well so they can drive in and drop their stuff off. I said that is actually what we don’t want.
Mr. Winfree: Are you talking about by the pavilion the opening there? Mr. Carney: Yes. It has to be closed.
Mr. Szozda: They had that backhoe up there and I thought they were in the process of putting it up.
Mr. Carney: We have to supply the material. Get with your partner over there and
see.
Mr. Winfree: I don’t know if we can do the work there. We can supply the materials,
but I don’t think we can.
Mr. Burgess: We have an adopt a park agreement. Mr. Carney: Pat, you know how to get it done.
Mr. Szozda: I can get that taken care of. Mr. Carney: Thank you. That is all I have. Mr. Winfree: Do you have anything?
Ms. Tropea: No, I am good. Mr. Shipe: Nothing for me.
Mr. Murray: I don’t have anything.
Mr. Winfree: I don’t have anything either. I can’t adjourn the meeting. All I can do it take a quick break.
Mr. Burgess: I can do it from here. That will conclude Segment I of the regular meeting. The time is 6:57 p.m. We will pause the meeting and reconvene the start of the shade session. That will end the public portion of it and wait until 7:15 pm for the Segment 2 when the shade session starts.

Segment II: 7:15 p.m.

Mr. Burgess: We will reconvene the regular meeting of the Turtle Run Community Development District. Today is March 30, 2026 and the time is 7:15 p.m. We will start with Item 10 on the agenda the Annoucement of the Commencement of Attorney- Client Session.

TENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Announcement of
Commencement of Attorney-Client Session
Mr. Cochran: Mr. Chairman if you would like you can read the script announcing the shade session or if you would like I can read that for you.
Mr. Winfree: Go right ahead.
Mr. Cochran: The Board of Supervisors hereby commences a pending litigation attorney client session to discuss the pending litigation Turtle Run Community Development District vs. Anzco, Inc. and the Tamara Peacock Company Architects of Florida, Inc. at al, Case #CACE- 2023-019116 – 17th Judicial Circuit, Broward County, Florida to which Turtle Run Community Development District is presently a party which is now pending before the 17th Judicial Circuit in Broward County, Florida. The meeting will continue in private session at the Coral Bay Recreation Center, 3101 South Bay Drive, Margate, Florida 33063 to discuss settlement negotiation or strategy sessions related to litigation expenditures pursuant to Section 286.011 (8) Florida Statutes. It is estimated that the attorney-client session will last 30 minutes. The persons attending the attorney-client session of the Board of Supervisors are Chairperson Barry Winfree, Vice Chairperson Eugene Skip Carney, Assistant Secretary James Rob Shipe, Assistant Secretary Kenneth Murray, Assistant Secretary Virginia Ginny Tropea, District Counsel Scott Cochran, District Manager Patrick Burgess and Special Counsel Matthew Fornaro. The entire session will be recorded by certified court reporter, Cheryl Wilson of the Universal Court Reporting, who will also be present. The Board of Supervisors will resume the public meeting at this location following the pending litigation attorney-client session.

ELEVENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Attorney-Client Session

Florida Statues, for case of TURTLE RUN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT V. ANZCO, INC. AND THE TAMARA PEACOCK ARCHITECTS OF FLORIDA, INC., Case No. CACE-2023-019116 (Fla. 17th Jud. Cir)
(Public Attendance and Participation is not Permitted – See Section 286.011 (8) Florida Statute)

TWELFTH ORDER OF BUSINESS    Announcement of Termination
Attorney-Client Session
Mr. Burgess: We are going to reconvene the regular meeting. The time is 7:46 p.m.
It is March 30, 2026.
Mr. Cochran: I hereby announce that the private pending litigation attorney-client session regarding Turtle Run Community Development District vs. Anzco, Inc. and the Tamara Peacock Company Architects of Florida, Inc. at al, Case #CACE -2023-019116 to which Turtle Run Community Development District is presently a party which is now pending before the 17th Judicial Circuit in Broward County, Florida is terminated.
Mr. Burgess: We just need a motion to adjourn.

THIRTEENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS Adjournment

On MOTION by Ms. Tropea seconded by Mr. Winfree with all in favor, the meeting was adjourned.

Assistant Secretary/Secretary	Chairman/Vice Chairman

Certificate Of Completion

Envelope Id: 12D138BA-363B-871E-82AC-DC754C975DF4	Status: Completed Subject: Turtle Run: Complete with Docusign: 3-30-26 Minutes.pdf, MSB Capital Markets.pdf
Source Envelope:
Document Pages: 29	Signatures: 3	Envelope Originator:
Certificate Pages: 2	Initials: 0	Ellen Acosta

AutoNav: Enabled
EnvelopeId Stamping: Enabled
Time Zone: (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada)

1001 Bradford Way
Kingston, TN 37763 eacosta@gmssf.com
IP Address: 162.199.192.217

Record Tracking

Status: Original
5/12/2026 6:16:26 AM

Holder: Ellen Acosta
eacosta@gmssf.com

Location: DocuSign

Signer Events	Signature	Timestamp

Barry W. Winfree bjwinfree@outlook.com Chairman
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
(None)	Signature Adoption: Pre-selected Style
Using IP Address: 169.150.221.54

Sent: 5/12/2026 6:18:02 AM Viewed: 5/12/2026 11:01:51 AM Signed: 5/12/2026 11:04:51 AM

Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Not Offered via Docusign

Patrick Burgess		Sent: 5/12/2026 6:18:03 AM	
pburgess@gmssf.com		Viewed: 5/12/2026 7:08:25 AM	
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication (None)	

Signature Adoption: Pre-selected Style	Signed: 5/12/2026 1:08:07 PM	
	Using IP Address:		
	2601:582:c300:60d0:485b:309:42b0:45		
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Not Offered via Docusign			
In Person Signer Events	Signature	Timestamp	
			
Editor Delivery Events	Status	Timestamp	
			
Agent Delivery Events	Status	Timestamp	
			
Intermediary Delivery Events	Status	Timestamp	
			
Certified Delivery Events	Status	Timestamp	
			
Carbon Copy Events	Status	Timestamp	
			
Witness Events	Signature	Timestamp	
			
Notary Events	Signature	Timestamp	
			
Envelope Summary Events	Status	Timestamps	
Envelope Sent	Hashed/Encrypted	5/12/2026 6:18:03 AM	
Certified Delivered	Security Checked	5/12/2026 7:08:25 AM	

Envelope Summary Events	Status	Timestamps	
Signing Complete	Security Checked	5/12/2026 1:08:07 PM	
Completed	Security Checked	5/12/2026 1:08:07 PM	
Payment Events	Status	Timestamps