MINUTES OF MEETING TURTLE RUN
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT

A regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the Turtle Run Community Development District was held on Monday, September 29, 2025, at 6:00 p.m. at the Coral Bay Recreation Center, 3101 South Bay Drive, Margate, Florida.

Present and constituting a quorum:
Barry Winfree	Chairman
Skip Carney	Vice Chairman
Virginia Tropea	Assistant Secretary
Rob Shipe	Assistant Secretary Also present were:
Patrick Burgess	District Manager
Scott Cochran	District Counsel
Jonathan Geiger	District Engineer
Pat Szozda	Governmental Management Services Residents

FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS	Roll Call
Mr. Burgess called the meeting to order and called the roll.

SECOND ORDER OF BUSINESS	Moment of Silence
Mr. Winfree led a moment of silence.
THIRD ORDER OF BUSINESS	Pledge of Allegiance
Mr. Winfree led the Pledge of Allegiance.
FOURTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Good News
Mr. Winfree: Any good news? Mr. Carney: No thank you.
Mr. Winfree: Anybody else?

FIFTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Approval of the minutes of the
August 25, 2025, Meeting

Mr. Winfree: Approval of the minutes for the August 25, 2025 meeting. Any changes or any questions or anything? If not, a motion to approve.

On MOTION by Mr. Carney seconded by Mr. Shipe with all in favor, the Minutes of the August 25, 2025, Meeting were approved.

SIXTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Consideration of:
Amendment #12 to Landscape Services Agreement between Turtle Run Community Development District and BrightView Landscape Services, Inc.
Mr. Winfree: We are on the consideration portion. Amendment #12 to the landscape agreement with BrightView. As far as I understand it is the standard 3% that we put in the contract. It was just a little late coming in for the notification. We already have it on our budget.
Mr. Carney: That is not true. There is no 3% in the contract. We talk about every year. It is really not in the contract. Last year we did give them the 3% because Pat said they were doing their due diligence. They did a good job, so they got the 3%.
Mr. Winfree: I thought we agreed last year to the 3%. Mr. Burgess: They are requesting a 3% increase.
Mr. Carney: We didn’t amend the agreement to have 3% every year. Mr. Burgess: No.
Mr. Carney: I think Pat is the true test. Pat you say they are probably doing a good job this year, correct?
Mr. Szozda: Yes. Very attentive. I have no problem with BrightView. Mr. Winfree: It is in the budget right?
Mr. Burgess: Yes.
Mr. Winfree: I thought we did an addendum to put that in last year. Mr. Carney: No.
Mr. Burgess: Moving forward we told them they should be submitting it prior to budget season.
Mr. Carney: We visited that about three years when BrightView came and said well it is in the contract. Jennifer and I went through all twelve amended agreements. There

was no such thing in the contract. We basically told them you live up to your agreement, or you don’t get anything. That one year they were doing a terrible job. Right Pat?
Mr. Szozda: Correct.
Mr. Carney: We had multiple meetings with them telling them you better step up to the plate, and they did. That is where we are.
Mr. Winfree: Alright. Any other discussion? So we are covered by the budget and that shouldn’t be an issue. Can I get a motion to approve the 3%?

On MOTION by Mr. Carney seconded by Mr. Shipe with all in favor, Amendment #12 to Landscape Services Agreement with BrightView Landscape Services, Inc. was approved.

Proposal with Eagle Group, Inc. to Replace Turtle Run Blvd and Sample Road Flagpole Up-Lights
Mr. Winfree: The next item is the lights on Turtle Run Boulevard for the flagpoles. The last I remember we talked about trying to clean them because they were all covered with condensation and falling apart. We attempted that Pat from what I understood.
Mr. Szozda: Correct.
Mr. Winfree: The seals are gone and no way to get replacement parts from what I am hearing.
Mr. Szozda: That is exactly correct.
Mr. Winfree: The only choice we had was to replace them. There is no repair since there is no repair parts.
Mr. Burgess: Turtle Creek Drive was just replaced.
Mr. Winfree: When we put the new poles in. Any discussion or questions on that? Mr. Carney: How old are they do you know?
Mr. Szozda: They are at least six years old. They could be older.
Mr. Geiger: Those poles might be pre-Covid. Those were the original poles. Mr. Carney: So they are over ten years old.
Mr. Winfree: That would be my guess. I don’t remember them being replaced. They were not cheap but what else can you do?
Mr. Szozda: They look original.

Mr. Winfree: They look nasty. They are very well worn. I am surprised they lasted this long to tell you the truth.
Mr. Carney: Is this for three or all six?
Mr. Winfree: The ones on the other side are done. We did that when we did the poles. Any other discussion? Can we get a motion to pass it?

On MOTION by Mr. Carney seconded by Mr. Shipe with all in favor, a proposal from Eagle Group, Inc. to replace Turtle Run and Sample Road Flagpole Up-Lights was approved.

Proposal with People’s Choice Pressure Cleaning, Inc. for Annual District Pressure Cleaning
Mr. Winfree: The next item is the proposal from People’s Choice Pressure Cleaning for the annual pressure cleaning. It came in under budget again.
Mr. Szozda: He hasn’t raised the price in three years or the three years that I have been here he has never raised it.
Mr. Winfree: And we added a little bit too didn’t we?
Mr. Szozda: That was an additional proposal but that stretch down Wiles Road.
Mr. Winfree: By the back of the school and in front Windsor now it is all cleaned up. Compared to what it looked like.
Mr. Carney: The school is trimming those trees too.
Mr. Szozda: I had Santos actually go back there and cut the fence back, the vegetation that was growing there.
Mr. Carney: It looks a lot better. You couldn’t even walk down the sidewalk.
Mr. Winfree: Yeah, that was how bad it was. Any further discussion on that one? Mr. Carney: I don’t think so.
Mr. Winfree: Can I get a motion to approve?

On MOTION by Mr. Shipe seconded by Mr. Carney with all in favor, a proposal with People’s Choice Pressure Cleaning, Inc. for the annual District Pressure Cleaning was approved.

Turtle Run Blvd Lake Interconnect Pipe Cleaning Proposals
Raptor Vac-Systems, Inc.
PCI Stormwater Solutions, Inc.
Mr. Winfree: The next item we talked about this at the last meeting. This is part of the work that was.
Mr. Burgess: I can go over that.
Mr. Winfree: Do you have the proposal from the Industrial Divers where we said we were going to have to go outside to do that because they didn’t have the capability of doing it? We got two quotes for that.
Mr. Burgess: This is for site #12 beneath Turtle Run Boulevard. The city does the catch basin cleanings, and we are responsible for the pipes connected to the lakes. We have two quotes from companies for the area. The area that is needing to be done is in between the baffles but there is a little bit of area outside of the baffles Raptor Vac is proposing doing the entire stretch whereas PCI Stormwater Solutions is only the 43 feet. Mr. Winfree: That is where we connect to lakes 2, 3, and 4 and they come under
Turtle Run Boulevard and come over into lake 5. That little pipe that goes over to lake 5 is what we are talking about cleaning out.
Mr. Burgess: Yes.
Mr. Winfree: The baffles are right where the catch basins are. Raptor Vac is going to clean the entire pipe for the price they are proposing where PCI is only proposing to the baffle which is a smaller amount, and they are more expensive. I think the best option for the Board if Raptor Vac. We work with them.
Mr. Carney: Have you worked with them before? Mr. Burgess: Yes.
Mr. Carney: Sounds good.
Mr. Winfree: Any other discussion? I think the original estimate we had on that was around $18,000 if I remember correctly. That was only a small portion of it. Now we are getting the whole thing done for $14,500. Any further discussion required on that? Can I get a motion to approve?

On MOTIONO by Mr. Shipe seconded by Mr. Carney with all in favor, a proposal in the amount of $14,500 with Raptor Vac- Systems, Inc. for Turtle Run Blvd Lake Interconnect Pipe Cleaning was approved.

SEVENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS    Discussion of:
District Rules
Website – Services Page
No Trespassing Sign Map
Mr. Winfree: The next item is the District rules that we discussed last time. We had asked everybody to take a look and see if we had any more suggestions or anything. The only thing that I would suggest at this point after giving it a little more reflection is I would put the whole thing on hold until we figure out what we are doing with the lakes themselves.
Mr. Carney: I can agree with that.
Mr. Winfree: I don’t see any reason to try and push it. We haven’t had any for 30 years. I think it kind of behooves us to get the whole story from what we are going to do with the lakes before we try making any rules. Does that make sense? I don’t think we need a motion for that. We will just put that on hold, correct?
Mr. Burgess: Correct.
Mr. Winfree: The website have you come up with some updates or proposals or anything?
Mr. Burgess: Yes. I made the changes you guys requested. I will put some updated pictures once we add some Christmas lights up. I just want to get updated pictures and then we will post them.
Mr. Winfree: Have you put anything updated at all? You took some things off right? Mr. Burgess: That page is off the site for now until we can get everything updated.
I corrected a few things. The site has is updated. Once we have the lights up I will bring back pictures and update a page for you guys to take a look at.
Mr. Winfree: Does that sound good to everybody? Mr. Shipe: Yes.

Mr. Winfree: The No Trespassing sign map I believe in the last meeting we agreed we would be adding ten signs. We went out for a quote for that. Actually we approved it in a motion if we can do all that under $15,000.
Mr. Carney: I think there was some that we decided not to do.
Mr. Winfree: That is why instead of 14 we took four out and now there is 10 new ones. The two up by Turtle Run Boulevard that goes from lake 4 to 5 we took two out there. Where did we take the other two? Did we update the map?
Mr. Burgess: Yes we have the updated map.
Mr. Winfree: Instead of adding 14 we are only adding 10. We got the quotes back for both the poles and the installation just recently.
Mr. Burgess: Yes. The ten poles was $10,929 and the installation was $1,700 so
$12,629 is what we spent. It is under the not to exceed.
Mr. Winfree: I don’t think we need a motion for that. We already approved the motion. All we need to know now is we got the quotes, and we are going to move forward with it.

EIGHTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Staff Reports
Attorney
Mr. Cochran: Nothing today.
Mr. Burgess: If we need to have another shade session I am assuming that it will just be at the next meeting afterwards.
Mr. Cochran: I know our office has been talking with Matthew the special counsel, and Patrick about scheduling a shade session in advance of the mediation so that is something that we need to do. I know Mike is going to be in connect with Matthew about that. I guess if there isn’t a timing issue to do it at the next meeting. As long as that works with whenever the mediation is going to happen.
Mr. Burgess: I tried to connect him to see if he had an idea. If it happens before the next meeting can we get some type of direction to have a special advertisement for a shade session.
Mr. Cochran: The shade session have to be specially advertised, and you have to bring a court reporter to be there to transcribe them. Those are some of the procedural differences for it. If there is some urgency to it or if there wasn’t something that couldn’t

wait until the regularly scheduled meeting and you needed a special meeting to do it. The purpose of the shade session is to discuss litigation strategy and potential settlement so going into mediation if there Mr. Cochran was inaudible at this time. public record until the litigation concludes then you would need the shade session to do that otherwise whatever discussions about that you have would be public.
Mr. Carney: Has the mediation been scheduled yet? Mr. Burgess: That is what I was trying to find out.
Mr. Carney: Try to figure out what we are going to do on this side.
Mr. Burgess: As soon as I hear from him that will determine if we can have the shade session at the next meeting or if we have to do a special advertisement to have a shade session to talk about it before.
Mr. Cochran: He might be inclined due to the nature of the District as a government entity and having the restrictions it might be something that if they set mediation it could be possible for them to reschedule it just to allow for the meeting as well. That would save the District money rather than having to do a special meeting.
Mr. Burgess: Ok.
Mr. Carney: Do we have any say at all when the mediation is going to be held or is that just something they are going to tell us?
Mr. Cochran: That would be up to special counsel. I don’t know the particulars here, but I know typically litigation the court will have a certain deadline for mediation to occur, and it is usually some period of time before trial is set to occur. Beyond that as long the parties comply to the deadline the court sets they are usually free to kind of schedule it to a time that is mutually convenient for them. Typically though they do have to have representatives attend the mediation as well unless they get permission not to do that. All those scheduling considerations usually come into play.
Mr. Winfree: Was that what that big list of witnesses was put out for? Mr. Cochran: It was probably for the trial.
Mr. Winfree: Yeah I saw a whole list of people.
Mr. Cochran: Usually the mediations is more each party’s attorney represents their argument for their best-case scenario to impress the other party why they should prevail. Then the mediator tries to work it out.

Mr. Burgess: I can find out from special counsel.
Mr. Winfree: And send it out to everybody. Is that it? Mr. Burgess: Yes.
Engineer
Engineer’s Report
Updates on Avana Apartments/Tract Q-2 Lake Side Slope Repair
Proposal with Landshore Enterprises to Investigate Drainage Pipe Conditions at Avana Apartments Location
Mr. Geiger: Good evening. Let’s start with the Avana repairs, the lakeside slope repair. I know at the last meeting we approved the change order for Landshore to change their scope based on the new findings with that pipe not being right where the side slope is. We had the divers out the day after the meeting. They could not find the pipe at all down there. The report is in the agenda. They excavated about three feet up and couldn’t find it. They tried to access through the structure in the Avana parking lot. It turned out that it was completely full of silk so they got about 8 feet in and then the pipe was more than half full so they couldn’t complete that dive to check to see the rest of the pipe. So at this time we still don’t know the integrity of that pipe. We do know the outfall on the catch basin was loose or off I believe from the report. There is a lot of sediment in that pipe. Industrial Divers I want to say they came back with something that was a little bit more expensive or pretty pricey. I forgot what they came back with. They didn’t provide us anything then. They do have some concerns with the end section of that pipe that is in the District lake being dislodged since they couldn’t find it. They recommended that we try to excavate that out and check the integrity of that. That is what South Florida Water Management is looking for us to do as well. At this time Landshore has provided a proposal to do some engineering work. They get out there with their own survey team and basically the work they think is necessary to provide the District with an accurate quote on how to excavate that pipe out correctly and provide any sort of maintenance solution. Industrial Divers recommended putting a headwall in that pipe. I don’t know if that is something that is necessary. That would be expensive. At this time I do believe that Landshore since they are the ones doing the other repair which was $9,000 or $10,000 cheaper based on the change of scope. This proposal is for $4,500 for them to provide the District with a plan of action to address the actual pipe. I think without them doing this step it is a shot in the dark with them out there trying to figure out what to do. This would

be for some engineering work, survey and basically documentation of a report of what is going on down there. I guess this would be to basically get a better feel for what it is going to cost and take to actually dredge the pipe out. At this time we are only going to ask them to work on whatever is within the easement or the District lake. I know we had other proposals from other companies to blow the whole pipe out. We are not going to go ahead and do that. It not our responsibility to work with anything off District property not in the easement. The main thing we are concerned with right now is making sure that outfall isn’t in disrepair so we can have Landshore basically complete the original scope of work which was to reshape and regrade what we have on the erosion. South Florida has contacted me every two weeks, Gina the girl we met out there has emailed about this. I let her know that the Board only meets once a month so if we need approvals on things. They are kind of I don’t want to lenient because they haven’t tried to enforce anything yet, but they are being understanding on how the Board operates. I guess at this time we would be seeking the approval for the $4,500 for Landshore to do their work.
Mr. Carney: Where does the clogged pipe go to?
Mr. Geiger: Their parking lot is connected through a system of catch basins. The clog from what they could identify they probably have to look at the other side of pipe. The clog goes from where there is supposed to be an outfall in the parking lot. You can see it when you are standing on the site.
Mr. Carney: Once it crosses over onto private property whose responsibility is it?
Mr. Geiger: That would the Avana Apartments. It is their property. We don’t have an easement there. We discussed this with the attorney. There is no way the District can spend money on private property to fix that. We did have discussions moving forward about contacting some of these private properties trying to get this squared away.
Mr. Carney: Is it being addressed from the right side? Mr. Geiger: We can only address it from our side.
Mr. Carney: I understand that. I am wondering where the major problem really is.
Mr. Geiger: We can’t find the outfall that is a problem in itself. How does the water get out? If it is buried in dirt I don’t know.
Mr. Carney: We have to start from our side and go as far as we can go.

Mr. Geiger: That is basically what we are recommending. Landshore is basically going to be looking from our side and at the same time I spoke with Patrick about contacting the apartments and getting a reminder to them that they need to perform their own maintenance. If this pipe is completely clogged we are going to have to clear our side out anyways.
Mr. Carney: Is the apartment complex aware of what is happening? Mr. Burgess: We update them. We only spoke to them once.
Mr. Carney: They should be put on notice.
Mr. Geiger: A lot has happened since the last meeting.
Mr. Winfree: So basically the extra money we are going to spend now is above and beyond the $40,000 something that we have already approved to fix the bank and the rest of it, correct?
Mr. Geiger: This will still be below.
Mr. Winfree: When we add this in it will still be below the original quote.
Mr. Geiger: It will be below Landshore’s original quote. That doesn’t include what we paid Industrial Divers to do their initial investigation.
Mr. Winfree: The only other thing is, and I know we have had a lot of discussion on our portion, their portion and everybody’s portion. I think once we understand this a little bit better we need to talk to South Florida because what basically is going to happen here is if we don’t get them to clean out their basins we are going to be doing this all the time. As soon as we clean out our portion and they get a good rainfall if there is anything left it is going to flow right into the bottom of our pipe again and we are not back removing it again. Nothing is being caught in that catch basin because they are not cleaning them.
Mr. Carney: And this hasn’t been cleaned in probably 30 years.
Mr. Winfree: Exactly so it is all just flowing right through that pipe and clogging the whole pipe up. We need to get three things in my opinion. One is getting the permits figured out so we know who owns what and who is responsible for what. Then we have to go back and make sure that all the individual owners take Hidden Lake for example, there is 14 drains, catch basins, that exit four different pipes into the lake. There is no way that that CDD is going to clean all that out to keep that open. Each individual owner of that private property is going to have to start doing their catch basins or we are going to

be spending thousands of dollars to keep cleaning the pipe out because they are not doing their basins. That is my opinion. If anybody has a different opinion. I think the next thing we need to do is set up a meeting with South Florida and talk to them. The first thing is where we are with the permits.
Mr. Geiger: Yes. That is something we did speak about providing a list with every permit or application that is under our master permit, who the owner is and who the operating entity is. There is either some misinformation on there because the District is listed as the operating entity for some of these private owners or there is something called the Turtle Run Improvement District listed which I have no clue what legal entity that is.
Mr. Winfree: Right now without getting these permits we can’t sit down with South Florida if we don’t know who owns what. As far as we can tell and as far as the HOA’s have looked into this there is no permit for them. There is no county permit, which would be a county permit.
Mr. Geiger: There is no county permits whatsoever.
Mr. Winfree: We are the last ones to get stuck because they don’t clean out their basins.
Mr. Geiger: There is a lot of permits under the Master permit.
Mr. Winfree: It seems like more entities then we have within the District.
Mr. Geiger: Circling back to the proposal I do believe this is worth it for Landshore to properly complete this job since the divers could not get in there I think this is going to be a necessary item to undertake.
Mr. Winfree: Do we have a quote for this?
Mr. Geiger: This is $4,500 for the engineering work, survey and figure out they can provide a solution.
Mr. Winfree: Any further questions or discussion? Do we need Rob in here to do a vote or not?
Mr. Burgess: We don’t. For the record Rob stepped out but we have a quorum. Mr. Winfree: Can I get a motion to move forward with the $4,500 for the slope
repair.

On MOTION by Mr. Carney seconded by Ms. Tropea with all in favor, a proposal in the amount of $4,500 with Landshore Enterprises to investigate drainage pipe conditions at Avana Apartments location was approved.

Mr. Geiger: Is there going to be a new contract?
Mr. Cochran: We can probably do an extra work thing off the contract. We can either do an amendment or if it authorizes extra work on the terms we can just do a one or two page that says they are going to do this additional work under the terms of the original contract.
Mr. Geiger: Outside of that area our survey team has completed all the office processing for the rest of the surveys. Sometime this week I should have all the lake surveys. They had to go back and revise a couple of phases 1 and 2 which they had previously already done. There was a mix-up with the data conversion. It was just a little bit of extra work on their part to fix some of the callouts and everything. Looking through phase 1 work I know we talked briefly about this. Those geo-tube are definitely in the area that need to be 4:1 so I basically confirmed that. Pat started talking with Bob about the best way to go about this. I think at this time KCI is going to lean towards recommending putting a more of a generic bid out for the first phase considering the complexities with the geo-tubes and getting proposals back from contractors without a set scope. I looked at Mr. Geiger was inaudible at this time. There is a lot of different methods so we are not tying ourselves into one design that the District would have to pay KCI to do. We let a contractor kind of do a design build on this. If we get five contractors and they all do five different methods, but I don’t think in this instance that is a bad thing. I think if KCI spent a bunch of money doing a design and the contractor back and said I can do it cheaper this way and the District just spent $10,000 on something where we could have just asked for generic proposals for. I think that is what KCI is going to recommend. We have until the end of next year to get phase 1 done. We are not hurried to get it done at this moment. I would like to take a little bit more of look at this and see if I can talk with a contractor to see what the best solution might be. If it is something that can get designed. If someone says they are all going to pitch this idea then maybe we can have more constraints to it.

I think since it such a unique situation that locking ourselves into one design to put out to bid is going to be costly to the District.
Mr. Carney: Good approach.
Mr. Geiger: The other lakes that I looked at could easily be fixed from the shoreline. The two phases are going to be the most difficult with the size and the scope. That is probably where we are leaning to go at least with the phase 1 lakes with the geo-tubes.
Mr. Winfree: Any questions? Does everybody agree on the approach? Mr. Geiger: That is all I have unless there is any questions.
Field Manager – Annual Maintenance Report
Mr. Winfree: Pat do you have a litany of things there?
Mr. Szozda: I have a few. We will start with the annual maintenance plan. Obviously the tree trimming is underway. They should be wrapping that up this week. They are pretty much on schedule. There was ten trees removed on Lake Julia, the Target lake over there. I am in the process of getting proposals to replace the ones they took out. I am waiting for that proposal. CDI started the Christmas light installation. I believe all the monuments are done minus the hedges. The trees are done. They are way ahead of schedule. That should not be an issue. We had a pole hit over at the entrance to 43rd that Patrick had Horsepower come out and remove. Today Patrick and I installed a temporary 25-mile an hour sign over there. The time that it takes to get these poles it maybe a year. We are still waiting for the one on Wiles Road that was hit. But again we are addressing those issues. The lakes just a quick update Southeast Land & Water they are doing an awesome job. They are almost back to where we originated. There are a few areas where some of the debris is a little heavy but most of it is really looking good. I did request a water quality analysis that hasn’t been done in a few years. They are going to get on that and give us an update on that. Once the pressure cleaning is complete the next item on the annual maintenance plan is the sanding of the pavers which we will address once that is taken care of. They did it last year and replaced a bunch of bricks that may or may not need to be done again. We won’t know until the pressure cleaning is done. That is everything that I have.
Mr. Winfree: Any questions?

Mr. Shipe: Do we get an annual or quarterly report or anything from Redline Iguana removal?
Mr. Szozda: They should be sending a monthly report. We met with them, and we took them to specific areas. If there is a hot bed you can get a hold of them, and they will meet with us, and we can address it as needed. Unless you are narrowing it down for him there is a lot of ground to cover out there.
Mr. Burgess: Typically they send pictures of what they have done.
Mr. Winfree: I have an answer for Hidden Lake at the last members’ meeting they were saying that the lake behind 63rd Avenue the one where the roundabout is they are hacked with them. One guy sent me a picture of four iguana, one on the roof, one on the screen climbing up and one on the back yard. It is ridiculous. I talked to Pat and Redline came out.
Mr. Szozda: He was at that gentleman’s house the last time he was out there. Mr. Winfree: Again?
Mr. Szozda: Yes.
Mr. Carney: Does Hidden Lake have a website? Mr. Winfree: No.
Mr. Carney: The Estates has it on their website and residents can email directly to Redline and they come out.
Mr. Winfree: Really.
Mr. Carney: What happens is unless they are invited to a house they don’t go to houses or in between houses. People are requesting them to come to their home because they have an iguana problem. It is working out pretty well by the way.
Mr. Szozda: He had an extensive printout. He probably had 20 addresses.
Mr. Carney: He knows where he can go, and he knows where he can’t go. This works out well when the homeowner invites them to their property. They pull a lot out.
Mr. Winfree: Any other questions?
Manager – Progress Report
Mr. Burgess: The park bathroom renovation was executed at their last commission meeting and Jennifer is working on getting them payment. We will update you guys as we get updated on that progress.  We talked about the No Trespassing signs. The

Industrial Divers repairs and I am waiting to find out their start date. I believe the rain set them back a little. We will let you guys know. Nothing new with 4 & 5 the light pole damage. Jonathan covered the lake bank repair at Avana and the action plan from KCI and South Florida Water Management compliance request. The park upgrades do you have anything to provide Skip feel free. I did not have any updates.
Mr. Carney: I sent Lou a text message earlier this week and I asked him for some updates. The pickle ball and tennis courts obviously they are working around the rain. Once they put the surface down it can’t rain. It has to be dry for six to eight hours, so they are in and out right now. They are working on that. I asked a question about the curbing. The curbing is looking good but they are planning on resurfacing the blacktop so he can’t answer that. PW can provide a schedule. We need a schedule to remove the basketball court. They are waiting to confirm the fabrication of the new pavilion before they remove the basketball court because that is where the new pavilion is going to go. Rob said they may be replacing the fence around the pickle ball courts but I didn’t get an answer to that question. I also let him know that Tortoise Way hasn’t been done in years, but he is not a road construction guy. Tortoise Way is the worst roadway that we have at this time. I am just throwing that out there.
Mr. Winfree: They have done a couple spot repairs, two or three.
Mr. Carney: The street needs to be redone. It is terrible. It is cracked all over. I mentioned the irrigation, and they said they will do a wet-check, and they will do an inspection and repair in any of those areas over there by the play set that needs to be upgraded. I know there is also hot spots over there when it is dry. I asked about the exercise equipment. His comment was they are working with a company called Green Field Fitness and they are sharing ideas on some of their more popular pieces. We can share that with Turtle Run once we have a set of equipment options. I asked about the solar lighting. He said next year’s budget they are going to put the solar lighting in or some sort of lighting in for the pickle ball courts in 2026 and 2027. That is pretty much it.
Mr. Burgess: Thank you. I don’t have anything additional. Everything is as is. I sent out the mid-month update. Do you guys want me to continue doing that?
Mr. Shipe: Yes.
Mr. Burgess: That is all I have on my side.

Mr. Carney: Right now the Estates is the only HOA that is doesn’t have their decorations done. At one time Rob on the Board of Directors at the Estates requested that the CDD at a cost of $7,500 to do all three entrances. Right now we do Harbor Island at $5,719, Hidden Lake at $3,500, Cypress Pointe if you count the oak trees that in front that we have done for years it runs around $8,000 and Newport right now is not requesting that the CDD does their Christmas lights although I think we should since we do everybody else’s. Newport would be about $4,000. With that said per capita when you look at the numbers Harbor Island is $49 per household, Hidden Lake is $53, the Estates would be $29, Cypress is $26, and Newport would be $38. Per capita they are all about the same. I think we should do it if we are going to do any of them at all we should do the Estates. That would be the last one that we need to do. The price is $7,560.
Mr. Winfree: Didn’t we already do the lights on the bushes for the Estates at those three entrances?
Mr. Carney: No.
Mr. Winfree: There wasn’t anything done last year?
Mr. Carney: The electric is there. They will do the bushes and the they will do the palm trees.
Mr. Winfree: Ok.
Mr. Carney: You can say that a number of years when we started doing the HOA’s I did make a mention that once you start doing it you are opening up a Pandora Box and here we are now doing all six which I think we should do. I think it is one of the most important things that we do because I think holiday lights touches 100% of the homeowners. Lake banks are important but who do they affect. Most people don’t even know we do lake banks. We are spending a lot of money in different areas, but I think holiday lights touches every homeowner and every taxpayer in the District and I think we should do a good job. I think we need a motion to approve that. Patrick I think she will probably send it to you today.
Mr. Burgess: So you are asking for approval of $7,560.
Mr. Winfree: Before we do a motion let’s make sure we have discussion first. Any questions?
Mr. Shipe: That is for this Christmas?

Mr. Carney: Yes, 2025. Just so everyone knows we have a three-year contract with CDI that they removed 2.5%. They knocked down their price by 2.5% which is about
$2,500 per year, and they locked this in at a price without raising it 5% a year like they do everyone else. This year Joe will do the same thing for us moving forward, 2025, 2026 and 2027 will be locked in at the same prices for the next three years if we stay with them still realizing the reduction in price they gave us three years ago. I think that it is pretty good not to have inflation get in the way of everything that we do here. They will lock us in at that price and we have used them for many years. I don’t see us changing. They do a pretty good job. That is where we are.
Mr. Winfree: The only question I have is, is that an addendum to the addendum we just signed at the last meeting?
Mr. Cochran: How are the rest of the subdivisions covered?
Mr. Winfree: All under the one contract we just signed. Do an addendum to that? Mr. Cochran: Yes.
Mr. Winfree: Ok so that would be the motion.
Mr. Burgess: So it is a proposal from CDI to light the Estates, the three entrances for $7,560.

On MOTION by Mr. Carney seconded by Ms. Tropea with all in favor, a proposal from Christmas Designer in the amount of
$7,560 for lights at the three Estates entrances was approved.

Mr. Carney: Again Newport they don’t have Christmas lights paid for by the CDD. They pay for it on their own. Are you going to continue to do that Clarence?
Mr. Lohman: Yes.
NINTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Financial Reports
Approval of Check Register
Acceptance of Unaudited Financials
Mr. Winfree: Financial reports. Any questions, concerns or comments?	Nothing on that. Can I get a motion to approve?

On MOTION by Mr. Shipe seconded by Mr. Carney with all in favor, the Check Register and Unaudited Financials were approved.

TENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Public Comments
Mr. Winfree: Public comments. Chris do you have anything?
Mr. Kapish: A couple of things. The 3% increase for BrightView, BrightView is not the same company that it was. People that run that place people we know are gone. They don’t do a good job. They leave rust on the medians. The grass is in poor shape between the weeds and the dead spots and stuff like that. We just keep giving them 3% more. That whole grass section that we bided out hasn’t been bided out in years. That needs to be bided out and see what we can get. I don’t understand why we don’t do that. The other thing is that the trees at the main entrance are all pulling up the curbs. I don’t know if you have seen it Patrick, but the curbs and the pavers are all being pulled up. That needs to be looked at because that could be a major thing. It is nice to have Christmas lights, but the trees are pulling the curbs up and everything. You can have major damage.
Mr. Carney: Where are you referring to?
Mr. Kapish: The main entrance. We also had lights on the fountains and stuff at the main entrance that didn’t even work. I understand there is litigation, but we are putting lights on stuff. We are spending $7, 000 for the Estates. They have money for their own lights. We keep spending more and more money on Christmas lights. This is a taxpayer thing. They have no business in getting involved in taking care of all the HOA’s. The HOA’s have their own money. Two of you are on the HOA Board it is a conflict of interest. At the last meeting you brought up the thing about the Nativity Set that was perfectly good and everything. You implied that the CDD paid for the Nativity Set, $50,000, which isn’t true. It is lie. It is actually $35,000 and it was paid for because the Nativity Set was 15 years old and had to be repainted twice and the angle’s arm was broken and stuff. Skip implied that the CDD Board paid for that stuff, they didn’t. The Turtle Run Foundation did. The Turtle Run Foundation is a separate entity which I don’t know why we are talking

about the Turtle Run Foundation information here at this meeting because this meeting is a CDD meeting. It doesn’t include the Foundation. The Foundation they have their own meetings. People can go to those meetings. I just want to reiterate last meeting we had a big thing about that I couldn’t hear Skip. He turned sideways and doesn’t talk very loudly. I mentioned that to you Patrick. In Roberts Rules you can make a point, and you can make that point in a meeting. A meeting can’t be held if people can’t hear. It is not that I interrupted the meeting. It was a point of order. Thank you.
Mr. Burgess: Thank you.
Mr. Winfree: Clarence do you have anything? Mr. Lohman: No, sir.
ELEVENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Supervisors Requests
Mr. Winfree: Any Supervisor requests? Skip? Mr. Carney: No, thank you.
Mr. Winfree: Rob?
Mr. Shipe: No.
Mr. Winfree: Ginny? Ms. Tropea: All good.
Mr. Winfree: I don’t have anything either. That brings us to our last item. Can I get a motion adjourn.

TWELFTH ORDER OF BUSINESS    Adjournment

On MOTION by Mr. Carney seconded by Mr. Shipe with all in favor, the meeting was adjourned.

Assistant Secretary/Secretary	Chairman/Vice Chairman

Certificate Of Completion

Envelope Id: 6ED720AD-B2B4-433D-9C5E-B19CB9217B16	Status: Completed Subject: Turtle Run:Complete with Docusign: 9-29-25 Minutes.pdf, Performance Measures.pdf, Revised Memorandum Source Envelope:
Document Pages: 39	Signatures: 7	Envelope Originator:
Certificate Pages: 2	Initials: 0	Ellen Acosta

AutoNav: Enabled
EnvelopeId Stamping: Enabled
Time Zone: (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada)

1001 Bradford Way
Kingston, TN 37763 eacosta@gmssf.com
IP Address: 162.199.192.217

Record Tracking		
Status: Original
10/30/2025 10:18:40 AM	Holder: Ellen Acosta
eacosta@gmssf.com	Location: DocuSign	
Signer Events	Signature	Timestamp	
Barry W. Winfree bjwinfree@outlook.com Chairman	
	Sent: 10/30/2025 10:45:23 AM Viewed: 10/30/2025 11:03:20 AM Signed: 10/30/2025 12:58:42 PM	
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
(None)	Signature Adoption: Pre-selected Style
Using IP Address: 2600:1700:9072:24cf:1889:b3ac:40ee:cf72

Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Not Offered via Docusign

Michael J. Pawelczyk mjp@bclmr.com
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication (None)

Signature Adoption: Pre-selected Style Using IP Address: 192.110.170.61

Sent: 10/30/2025 10:45:24 AM Viewed: 10/30/2025 11:12:44 AM Signed: 10/30/2025 11:14:45 AM

Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Not Offered via Docusign

Patrick Burgess		Sent: 10/30/2025 10:45:23 AM	
pburgess@gmssf.com		Viewed: 10/30/2025 10:45:44 AM	
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication (None)	

Signature Adoption: Pre-selected Style	Signed: 10/30/2025 11:27:26 AM	
	Using IP Address: 162.199.192.217		
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Not Offered via Docusign			
In Person Signer Events	Signature	Timestamp	
			
Editor Delivery Events	Status	Timestamp	
			
Agent Delivery Events	Status	Timestamp	
			
Intermediary Delivery Events	Status	Timestamp	
			
Certified Delivery Events	Status	Timestamp	
			
Carbon Copy Events	Status	Timestamp	

Witness Events	Signature	Timestamp	
			
Notary Events	Signature	Timestamp	
			
Envelope Summary Events	Status	Timestamps	
Envelope Sent	Hashed/Encrypted	10/30/2025 10:45:24 AM	
Certified Delivered	Security Checked	10/30/2025 10:45:44 AM	
Signing Complete	Security Checked	10/30/2025 11:27:26 AM	
Completed	Security Checked	10/30/2025 12:58:42 PM	
Payment Events	Status	Timestamps