MINUTES OF MEETING TURTLE RUN
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT

A regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the Turtle Run Community Development District was held on Monday, November 24, 2025, at 6:00 p.m. at the Coral Bay Recreation Center, 3101 South Bay Drive, Margate, Florida.

Present and constituting a quorum:
Barry Winfree	Chairman
Skip Carney	Vice Chairman
Virginia Tropea	Assistant Secretary
Kenneth Murray	Assistant Secretary
Rob Shipe	Assistant Secretary Also present were:
Patrick Burgess	District Manager
Scott Cochran	District Counsel
Jonathan Geiger	District Engineer
Jason Gitel	Governmental Management Services
Patrick Szozda	Governmental Management Services
Miguel Reto	Landshore Enterprises Residents

FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS	Roll Call
Mr. Burgess called the meeting to order and called the roll.

SECOND ORDER OF BUSINESS	Moment of Silence
Mr. Winfree led a moment of silence.
THIRD ORDER OF BUSINESS	Pledge of Allegiance
Mr. Winfree led the Pledge of Allegiance.
FOURTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Good News
Mr. Winfree: Good news. It is raining a little bit. Skip do you have any good news?
Mr. Carney: Yes. I think the District is looking pretty good in the holiday spirit. Our new Nativity set looks stellar thanks to Clarence and his crew. That is it.
Mr. Winfree: Ken?

Mr. Murray: No. Mr. Winfree: Rob? Ms. Shipe: No.
Mr. Winfree: Ginny? Ms. Tropea: Nothing.
Mr. Winfree: I am good too. If we get some more rain it will be even better. At least it is a start.

FIFTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Presentation of:
A. Exploratory Report and Change Order with Landshore Enterprises, LLC for the Avana Apartments Lake Bank Repair
Mr. Winfree: How are we going to handle this presentation here?
Mr. Burgess: We have Landshore here for item 5 the exploratory report and change order with Landshore Enterprises. After the last meeting we had the approval for the survey work and the lake dye work. Based on that they are providing a report and change order. That is starting on page 4. We sent out a revised agenda so it should have it. I can put it on the screen as well. Whenever you are ready.
Mr. Reto: Hello everybody. My name is Miguel with Landshore Enterprises. I am one of the junior engineers within the company. We were hired to originally come in and reconstruct the outfall for the Turtle Run community and as the project has been ongoing we identified additional issues with that project. The last type of work we did there was investigating and identifying where that pipe is comparing with original property plans for the outfall structure. In doing so what we did is we pumped in some dye on the nearest catch basin and let that dye work its way through. We were planning on seeing something matching the original plans where the dye would pop out further out into the lake approximately 40 feet from the shoreline but what we found was the dye was leaking through the side of the embankment at least 3 feet from the shore which is letting us think that pipe has some form of either collapse, either separated from the main portion or it has split open and allowed that sediment to seep in ultimately block it. The cover that we found in that area is approximately 4 to 5 feet worth of material that has covered that outfall at that location where the dye was coming through. We probed, measured the elevation. Within the report there is a few cross sections at the back to kind of demonstrate

what that pipe elevation references to the cross section of the elevation. What we are proposing a data right exploratory excavation of that area. We would bring in some dredging equipment and start to dredge out the material in front of that pipe, determine what the condition of that pipe looks for the purposes of either proposing a new install further out into the canal as per the original plans or option 2 depending on the stability of the surrounding area leave the pipe if the pipe is still in good condition but armoring the surrounding areas preventing any future sediment from falling in and blocking it. Those are our two options that we are considering. In regard to the data right it is $4,200 a day. My bosses went ahead and gave me the approval that we will cap it at four days maximum. If we are site for 4, 5 or 6 days we will still keep to that four days. Obviously if we get the job done in a day and get the pipe in a day you will only be charged the day rate for the service. Any questions?
Mr. Carney: When you are digging the pipe up would you be able to tell what caused it to collapse?
Mr. Reto: In a way yes because we are going to try to expose it and see what the condition of that pipe is. It could be the material itself. It is a coordinated aluminum pipe. It could be the material itself over its lifespan. I believe it has been in that ground since the 70’s so we are coming up on 50 or 60 years.
Mr. Carney: I am just kind of curious because I don’t think we ever knew we had a pipe there. Could it have happened during the construction of the apartment complex?
Mr. Reto: That is definitely a possibility that the pipe was probably not installed to the original characteristics for the required plans. What I mean by that is when I said earlier we were expecting it to show dye 40 feet out it was showing dye right at the side. It is possible that pipe was not installed correctly.
Mr. Carney: It is normal for a pipe like that to corrode.
Mr. Reto: Coordinated aluminum does have the tendency of doing that, but it has to be exposed to oxygen for it to happen.
Mr. Carney: I think we would like to know if you could give us that information if it could have possibly been crushed on the original construction of the apartment complex. I think that would be very interesting.

Mr. Reto: Photography would have to be done for that. Coming in with some CCP footage for the sediment that settled allowing for clear photos to be taken.
Mr. Carney: I am sure the blueprints going back to when they built that place as to how they did the piping.
Mr. Reto: Just a genetic blocking not in detail as to as built were done to it.
Mr. Geiger: What we provided Landshore was the as built but it is literally a line on a paper and they crossed out what the proposed invert was, what the actual invert was but to Miguel’s point it does show the pipe going 40 or so feet into the canal, even looking at aerial photos.
Mr. Reto: It is also measured at 190 feet from the catch basin.
Mr. Carney was inaudible at this time.
Mr. Reto: That is what we are assuming at this point in time. As we excavate we will be able to determine is there is another section to that pipe that has disconnected and slipped away or was there never another section.
Mr. Carney: That could be a possibility. I think we should look into that.
Mr. Shipe: I have two questions in that same vein. Is part of it was it not properly maintained, the drain that is clogged. Should there be some annual or semi-annual maintenance to make sure that is flowing out? If that was then that was our responsibility but if it is clogged on the property side is that the apartment complex, Avana’s, responsibility and do they share in any of the financial responsibility from the shore going backwards if they didn’t properly maintain it?
Mr. Reto: That is a possibility that there is some requirement for the community that feeds that pipe going out to make sure that it is annual or bi-annual cleaning on that area done. Those pipes and those catch basins typically have known as sump and the sump catches all that sediment from the road before it gets into the pipe and that takes it out. That sump should be sucked out and cleaned out or inspected and cleaned out. If you have a blockage or an obstacle impeding the flow any water and sediment that works its way through will start to settle and start to clog the whole length of the pipe. Typically during the operation of that pipe during a stormwater event it should flush out all of that but if it is not properly flowing out at the end it does it and slows down.
Mr. Shipe: Ok.

Mr. Winfree: You mentioned that it is the last basin. How many basins are there up from that one? If they are in the same condition cleaning that one all we are going to do is flush it right down the same way, right? I saw at least two that are connected to that one other basins.
Mr. Reto: Correct there is at least one that runs between the buildings to the west that is by the tennis courts. I went and checked that one out to make sure that they were not reverse flowing the dye. There was no dye coming out.
Mr. Winfree: Nothing came back that way.
Mr. Reto: Based on some conversations in the past my understanding is that system itself also needs cleaning out.
Mr. Winfree: That is what I am trying to get to. We are going to have to start doing that too. We will take care of that. It is time to have our meeting with South Florida to get the basins clean. If we clean this out and the other ones are in the same condition, and it keeps flowing down it is just going to block it again.
Mr. Reto: In a way, yes.
Mr. Winfree: That is something we need to look into. Any other questions?
Mr. Shipe: The $4,200 a day and the four days that is just to expose the pipe and
find it.
Mr. Reto: Correct. That is the labor and the equipment needed to be onsite to
remove the material to expose the pipe to look at it and identify option 1 are we able to extend this. Option 1 is potentially the pipe disconnected is right here or option 2 clean the area out, evaluate the slope and the surrounding area and armor it, protect it from future caving in and future settling blocking the functionality of that. That is a little bit riskier because still that outfall is quite close to your shoreline and settlement has a tendency of still working it way there. If that pipe is further out into the canal like was designed to be it is less of the chance of it blocking.
Mr. Shipe: That will be the second estimate and invoice for that work. Mr. Reto: There is another cost to come in the future.
Mr. Shipe: I guess it has to be done. I don’t know what it would take to see if Avana has responsibility for it.

Mr. Winfree: That is what exploratory is going to tell us is how far out or whether it is our pipe that goes beyond that. If it is all on their property we are going to have to talk to them. We will keep the bottom clean, but they need to get the basins cleaned. That is not just one but three or four connected to that one at least that have the same situation that aren’t being maintained. That is what caused the problem.
Mr. Carney: Jon what are you suggesting at this point?
Mr. Geiger: Landshore has been working very closely with myself and Patrick on this. They were originally hired to do the reconstruction on the shoreline. Giving that this pipe from the report is buried so right now the District responsibility for that portion that feeds into the lake, so I do believe at this point we do need to do the exploration. South Florida has been asking for us for updates and what is going on with the pipe. We did send them this report. They are satisfied we are making progress. They understand what is going on with the situation. And to Miguel’s point we are not going to know how to actually fix this unless we get the pipe exposed. Industrial Divers tried finding the pipe. That is when we determined the catch basin upstream was clogged and everything. I don’t believe they gave us any sort of way that they were going to handle it. They basically said we had to go find a contractor that would do that kind of work. Hopefully the exploration goes well, and we are not spending the four days out there. They did say a four-day max for everything.
Mr. Reto: They did encounter some rough material, but we were able to get down to on top of the pipe. That was still rough getting through that material. We believe dredging it out will be a cost-effective solution. If that is not possible getting in and excavating and having somewhat of reach and can gently excavate it out without damaging the pipe.
Mr. Winfree: One last question from me. Were you part of the original, I don’t know if you want to call it an excavation, remember all the concrete that was there? It kind of seems putting two and two together that concrete was put there because that pipe really wasn’t where it was supposed to and it was washing that out to begin with and that is why that concrete was put in.
Mr. Geiger: That concrete looks like it was just thrown there. It is construction debris because the plans that we have, none of those other outfall pipes had head walls.

That actually was 9 feet above where the invert should have been. It might have been at one-point somebodies fix over there but it doesn’t seem like the two were ever connected in anyway.
Mr. Winfree: It looked great with the hole in it and everything. Mr. Geiger: That section that hole was big for 32-inch pipe.
Mr. Reto: It was quite hefty and six inches in thickness itself but the whole placement of that concrete was odd. It was flipped upside down in some cases which would lead you to think it was not there. There is no way concrete that was part of a pipe would somehow reverse itself.
Mr. Geiger: It could have been construction debris from when they were building. Mr. Reto: That is most likely the likelihood.
Mr. Winfree: Alright, so any idea of when this would commence? We know it is one to four days. Is somebody going to be following these guys and give us an update on where we are at? The only reason I am asking is one of the proposals we have coming in is that we wouldn’t be here for Christmas. How do we bring this together?
Mr. Reto: We can hold back until next year.
Mr. Winfree: How do we want to handle this? The next time we meet will be 60 days from now. I don’t think we want to dig a hole and leave it open for 60 days. Just a thought.
Mr. Geiger: I don’t know how much it is going to cost to actually have the two methods so I don’t think the District can give a not to exceed and give Patrick unless you figure it out.
Mr. Winfree: It looks right now but if we go out there and dig a hole and then we are not around to make a decision for 60 days that is not going to be good in my opinion.
Mr. Reto: Most of the dredging will be taken place in the water. Unless someone is walking in the water.
Mr. Winfree: Like you said the dye came up and then I was looking at this picture here it looks like that dye came up before the shoreline. If we do find the pipe we still don’t know what the rest of it looks like. We still have to dig back to figure that out. So what is the recommendation here Jonathan?

Mr. Geiger: It sounds like we can do the dredging. Is the doing the fix right after the dredging more cost-effective or is this a situation where we want to wait and do the dredging then sit on it for week until the meeting and then it is easier instead of having to dredge that pipe again?
Mr. Reto: We can do the dredging and then cover it back up if needed then come back in.
Mr. Winfree: Work on it now and figure out what the next step is. Mr. Carney: Get it rolling.
Mr. Geiger: We can work with Miguel too. While the District is on break here so if we need to fine tune the proposal or pick a third option that they think of. We will have more information for the next meeting.
Mr. Burgess: The next meeting is the 26th of January if you don’t have the December meeting.
Mr. Winfree: Looking at pictures like you said it looks like it is coming from underneath the ground rather than into the water.
Mr. Reto: Patrick do they have access to the photo library as well? Mr. Burgess: Not the full library but I can always send it out to them. Mr. Winfree: So do we need a motion put together for this?
Mr. Burgess: Yes.
Mr. Winfree: Any other discussion?
Mr. Burgess: We need a motion to accept the change with Landshore for the Avana Apartments Lank Bank Repair with a not to exceed the cost of $16,800.

On MOTION by Mr. Shipe seconded by Mr. Murray with all in favor, a not to exceed amount of $16,800 for the Exploratory Report and Change Order with Landshore Enterprises, LLC for the Avana Apartments Lank Bank Repair was approved.

Mr. Reto: You will get a schedule for me for when we are mobilizing?
Mr. Burgess: Yes. We will reach out to you by next week with the next steps.

SIXTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Approval of the Minutes of the
October 27, 2025 Meeting
Mr. Winfree: Item #6 is the approval of the minutes of October 27, 2025 meeting. Anyone have any updates or concerns or anything from those minutes if not can I get a motion to approve?

On MOTION by Mr. Murray seconded by Mr. Carney with all in favor, the Minutes of the October 27, 2025 Meeting were approved.

SEVENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Approval of the Agreement with
Broward County Supervisor of Elections Office for the 2026 Elections
Mr. Winfree: Approval of the agreement with Broward County Supervisor of Elections.
Mr. Burgess: This was already approved at a prior meeting so we can move onto item 8.

EIGHTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Ratification	of	Interlocal	
	Agreement	for	Uniform	
Collection of Non-Ad Valorem Special Assessments
Mr. Winfree: The ratification of the interlocal agreement for uniform collection of Non-Ad Valorem Special Assessments.
Mr. Cochran: At the last meeting you all approved the agreement with the Supervisor of Elections. This agreement came from the tax collector, and it happened in a weird way where they submitted to us right before the end of October and they were requiring all the entities to have it signed by the end of that month. A lot of our Districts including this one didn’t have an opportunity to meet by that date and approve it in less than a week. Our office did confer with them regarding the agreement, made some changes and worked it out with them. Basically this District, like the others, has adopted

a resolution which is attached to this agreement that reflects the District’s intent to collect the assessments, the Non-Ad Valorem Assessments, by using the uniform method that the tax collector does where they put it on the tax rolls. They collect the funds. They remit what the District is entitled to the District. Really I think it is just a matter of housekeeping on their end. They wanted to update and formalize that arrangement with the parties that they are doing that for including all the special districts. That is what this agreement is. It is an interlocal agreement between this District and the tax collector with Broward County. Like I said our office has already reviewed the form with them prior to it being executed but because they did need it by the end of that month for purposes of collections the Chair and the Secretary did go ahead and sign that on behalf of the Districts. We would just ask for a motion to ratify that interlocal agreement with the tax collector unless anyone has any questions.
Mr. Winfree: The only thing I had was did you check that out?
Mr. Burgess: An exhibit states on pages 3 and 4 at the end of it, I am just confirming with Jennifer who put it together to make sure there is no additional page.
Mr. Cochran: I think what you are going to do is approve the ratification with the revise of it if there is a page 4 to that exhibit that will be provided and added to the official copy of the agreement.

On MOTION by Mr. Shipe seconded by Mr. Murray with all in favor, Ratification of Interlocal Agreement for Uniform Collection of Non-Ad Valorem Special Assessments with the revise of the agreement if there is a fourth page to the exhibit was approved.

NINTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Discussion of:
Amendment to Management Agreement
December 15, 2025 Meeting
Website Services Draft
Mr. Winfree: I think you handed out the amendment. That is basically for the end of year Christmas bonus for GMS managers.
Mr. Cochran: Just for a point of clarification. It is technically the amendment that recognizes that certain employees of GMS have provided services throughout the year

and over this holiday period go above and beyond for the services that are required per your contract, so it is additional compensation in the form of an amendment to that agreement with the management company.
Mr. Winfree: Any questions on that? Can I get a motion to approve the amendment?

On MOTION by Mr. Carney seconded by Mr. Shipe with all in favor, the Amendment to the Management Agreement was approved.

Mr. Kapish: Do we know how much that is? Mr. Winfree: Yes.
Mr. Kapish: How much? Mr. Winfree: $500.
Mr. Kapish: Total?
Mr. Winfree: No. $500 for two. $1,000 total. Mr. Burgess: Thank you.
Mr. Winfree: The December 15th meeting traditionally we don’t have the Christmas meeting. It seems like we don’t have a lot going on except for Avana right now. They are going to hold that until we get back. We should be ok there. Is there any reason we should or shouldn’t have a meeting?
Mr. Burgess: I don’t think so.
Mr. Winfree: Everybody is alright at this point saying we are going to cancel the December 15th meeting?
Ms. Tropea: Yes.
Mr. Carney: I am ok with it.
Mr. Winfree: Ok, can I have a motion to approve the cancellation of the December 15th meeting?

On MOTION by Mr. Carney seconded by Ms. Tropea with all in favor, the cancellation of the December 15, 2025 meeting was approved.

Mr. Winfree: Website services draft.
Mr. Burgess: I was trying to put it together. How the website is formatted I just need to involve the website designer. It is really just updating pictures, so I just wanted to get a picture of the roundabout and the Christmas lights, maybe the park and an updated monument picture. I haven’t been able to complete it yet.
Mr. Winfree: Well you can give it to us as a Christmas present and be ready to talk about in the new year.
Mr. Burgess: If the Board wants to appoint someone to approve what gets put on there I can work with that person in the meantime until the next meeting. It is really just updating the pictures. Putting it together how the website shows is a little difficult.
Mr. Carney: When you get a chance if you want to bounce some off I would be glad to work with you and when we come to the meeting we can make a decision.
Mr. Burgess: That is fine. I will work with Skip on that. Mr. Winfree: We don’t need a motion for that.
TENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Staff Reports
Attorney
Mr. Cochran: Just a reminder about the ethics training since we won’t be meeting in December if you haven’t already knocked out four hours of ethics training remember to do that by December 31st. That is all I have unless you have any questions.
Mr. Winfree: Is there anybody who hasn’t done it? Everybody is aware of what needs to be done.
Mr. Carney: Send out an email. I haven’t done mine yet.
Mr. Winfree: I usually do mine the middle of December in case anything happens to tell you the truth.
Mr. Burgess: We can send out an email.
Mr. Shipe: Not that we have to discuss it but did the mediation happen?
Mr. Carney: No it hasn’t happened yet. They keep changing the dates right now.
Mr. Burgess: The ethics training links is on the website as well under CDD ethics training so you can go there. We will send an email as well. It has some free options and options to pay for.
Engineer

Mr. Geiger: Outside of the presentation Miguel did I don’t really have much else to add. I know I still owe the District a list of the permit holders. That kind of got back burned we have a couple of construction projects on right now that have taken me away from office work. I was also out of town for a week and a half last month. By the next meeting although we are not having one in December I will get that list of permit holders especially with what is going on with the Avana Apartments and get some of this maintenance work hopefully done by the people operate the systems and everything. I do know I owe that to you Barry. Outside of that though unless the Board has any questions. Basically we are just focusing on the Avana thing and then come first of the year we are going to have to sit down and start looking at what kind of proposal we want to put out to actually do the lake remediation work, the lake banks. Part of reason we asked Miguel to come is because they do that kind of work. Unless the Board has any questions about anything else?
Mr. Winfree: I see the surveying is all completed right? Mr. Geiger: Yes. Survey has been done for awhile now.
Mr. Winfree: I don’t want to put you on the spot but are we still on the same overall look, nothing has really changed where we thought we would start or what needs to be done? Is anything new and exciting popped up that we are not aware of?
Mr. Geiger: No, like I said we are going to try to the first couple of phases are the ones that South Florida asked us to focus on because they are near the property and everything. One of the things that is once they do start looking at some of the lakes under the FPL easements that might be work we need to confirm we have the funding. Those are going to be much easier hopefully. I haven’t taken too much of a deep dive into anything outside we are doing now, Avana, and the other two phases with the geo-tubes which is a different beast as we spoke about before. That is something definitely over the next couple of months I can see where we might build to accelerate or see what lakes we might have to address based on the finding analysis of what is going on out there.
Mr. Winfree: We are still going to put our priorities to start with in the same places.
Nothing in the overall plan has changed.
Mr. Geiger: We are still going to for now going to follow the six-year phasing plan that South Florida was ok with. Like I said if we can accelerate some of this, so we don’t

have to do some of the work then we look at revising that. I think for now try to focus on the three bigger lakes with the geo-tubes which are going to be the more difficult ones to resolve.
Mr. Winfree: Alright. Any questions for Jonathan? Ok, field manager.

Field Manager – Annual Maintenance Plan
Mr. Szozda: Just a few items and updates. The mulching has been completed. The gentleman that did it was subcontracted by BrightView. He did a very good job with that. It looks great. Pine straw was added to the preserve in the median. We installed cocoplums in front of Cumberland Farms that were in dire need of repair. They came out looking very nice. We took water samples, Southeast Water Management took water samples of the lakes. There was no abnormalities, which is a positive. Everything seems to be in order. The last item I have is I was approached by BrightView they would like to fly a drone over Turtle Run basically for advertising and promotional materials. If anybody has any reservations, I have to work out the legalities here with Scott. Scott is going to interject in a minute, but would anybody have any objections?
Mr. Carney: In other words don’t shoot it down right?
Mr. Winfree: What I would be concerned about like you said the legalities of private property. From a city standpoint I can understand that but there are state, city and county ordinances and statutes and everything about that. And you have to validate that they have been certified through the FAA.
Mr. Cochran: It is a little complicated because like you mentioned there is local, state and federal regulations regarding drone operation. We have done in the past with an entity that was doing some drone filming, and we did a separate agreement pertaining to where they were required to used licensed operators, comply with all the regulations and everything, insurance, indemnity provisions and things like that. The other thing would be obviously we can only grant permission over property that the District owns. To the extent that they would want to or have to capture footage of private property or non-District property we can’t grant permission for that. It would be their obligation to secure that themselves and we would want indemnity for any and all of that. It is possible but I will recommend that if we allow it especially since it is not something we are asking for it

is them asking for it for their own purposes I think we would want an agreement in place that governs some of those things to protect the District’s interests.
Mr. Winfree: Absolutely and taking that a step further even though it all will be all CDD property and you still have quote public in those areas.
Mr. Cochran: If it is District property it is public property. People don’t generally have any expectation of privacy in public properties so I wouldn’t be worried about capturing people on District property. Like I said it would be more to the extent if they are having to fly over private property or they are flying at such a height where there is private property in view basically the agreement would make that their problem not our problem. I think definitely we wouldn’t want to allow it unless there is an agreement in place that protects the District’s interests. It is up to you all too. If you want to ask them for a credit or something like that if they using it for their own purposes. Just throwing it out there.
Mr. Szozda: First of all does anybody have any objections or concerns? Mr. Carney: No.
Mr. Winfree: Yes. Definitely have concerns if they are not going to be able to meet all the requirements with the FAA flying over private property. How are you going to get permission from all the private property owners?
Mr. Szozda: It should be just District property. They are not flying over anybody’s house. This is just the areas they maintain. I am not saying I am for it or against it, I am just bringing to your attention. They approached me about this idea. This is preliminary.
Mr. Winfree: As an example if they fly over where the fountain is and they are going to be probably 500 feet or so and if they are going to capture a wide area in that shot they are going to get private property.
Mr. Szozda: I think their focus is just on what they maintain specifically. It would be no benefit to them overseeing private property. If they can work out the legal angles of it and they are willing to agree to it, this is preliminary. I told them I would bring it up at the meeting.
Mr. Burgess: We can request more information and bring it back to the January meeting.
Mr. Winfree: That is what I was going to suggest. The only thing is you might want to talk to them about does it necessarily have to be a drone because like you were saying

when you are up that high it is kind of hard to split into a 30- or 40-foot width of where the stuff that we own usually typically is.
Mr. Szozda: I don’t want to assume that they have done this before, but I would think they would have done it before.
Mr. Shipe: I don’t think it is Joe the lawnmower guy who is getting off the cart and going to fly a drone. They have a professional from a marketing company. He would be licensed, and they would know the rules.
Mr. Szozda: I am just looking to see if anybody has any objections then we can follow up on the legal ramifications.
Mr. Winfree: From the CDD standpoint I don’t know if it is limited to that area. But if it went outside of that area that is where we have issues.
Mr. Szozda: We will start the conversation. We will get some legal documentation.
Mr. Cochran: It is up to the Board direction, like do you want more information from the contractor first before you make a decision and before I start working on the legal thing or do you want that to go on now?
Mr. Shipe: I think we would like a little more direction and make sure if they are using a licensed marketing company to do the drone capture.
Mr. Szozda: I will find that all out.
Mr. Shipe: Find that out and if it is yes we can go from there.
Mr. Szozda: I just want to make sure there is no objections before I went any further.
Mr. Winfree: From the CDD standpoint I don’t think anyone has any objections.
Mr. Carney: I think it all needs to fall on BrightView. We don’t want our attorney spending all kinds of money drawing up legal documents for us.
Mr. Szozda: We will see what they have if they have some documentation already in order.
Mr. Cochran: You can always ask as part of the agreement that they cover any costs or expense preparing agreements or reviewing agreements.
Mr. Winfree: Ok, at this point we are not doing anything with a motion we need more information to make a decision.
Mr. Szozda: Thank you. That is all I have.

Mr. Winfree: One question since we already voted on the December meeting is there anything you need that you are doing in December?
Mr. Szozda: No at this point everything is on the annual maintenance, and everything is pretty standardized. There is nothing out of the ordinary. Christmas decorations are in place. Lights have been installed in the fountains. The Menorah is on a system where it is automatic.
Mr. Carney: We just have to set the date, and it will go on automatic every day after

that.

Mr. Szozda: There is nothing out of the ordinary.
Mr. Carney: Pat marked your calendar December 14th. It happens to be a Sunday

night by the way.
Mr. Winfree: Since we are talking about the Christmas decorations a little bit there were a few things that were a little late as far as CDI was concerned. It seems like it gets harder and harder to deal with them every year to get things done. Maybe it is time that we look for another. It doesn’t mean we have to go with someone else but maybe put it out for a bid just to see what else there is.
Mr. Carney: We can always put it out for a bid. I have no problem with CDI. I am the one that works with them closely every year.
Mr. Winfree: Then we are all set that not everything comes down but the lights get turned off and they are done by the end of January, so we don’t have any concerns going on there. Price wise I don’t think we are going to beat it to tell you the truth.
Mr. Shipe: I don’t know how many companies there are. Mr. Winfree: Alright. Patrick?
Manager – Progress Report
Mr. Burgess: The progress report starting on page 60 I have few updates on a few things. Item #1 we are still working with Lightworks on the replacement. We are trying to see if Stresscrete is who the current poles are with but there is another vendor that is going to send us a sample to see if they can match our pole and possibly be faster delivery. I am still working on that. Item #2 we have the lights. They came in and we have the agreement ready so we are going to get that signed and once the agreement is signed they will replace the lights. The lake name sign replacement there is two lake

name signs that have been missing for a year. They are being powder coated and once they are done there they will be picked up for vinyl company and have that completed. Item #4 Raptor Vac had a few mechanical issues and some of the plugs that they rent were not available, so they are going to start their work on Tuesday, which is good because there is some irrigation repairs right in the area. It is a tight spot, a big vacuum truck so they are going to probably have to straddled the curb. We might have some sod damage, but they will do all the repairs to anything that is damaged.
Mr. Winfree: On number 5, did we follow up with the city that they are actually going to start in December, and did we get the agreement?
Mr. Burgess: No but we will.
Mr. Winfree: The only reason I am asking is I am hearing rumbles that they are not going to start until next year.
Mr. Carney: Let me give you an update on it. I walked through with Justin he is one of the assistant park directors and he was telling me on what they were planning on doing. I went over to Cypress, I went over to Riverside and looked at those. Cypress was nice. Riverside was pretty shady, and I said we wanted tiled walls. We don’t want painted stucco walls that doesn’t belong in an upscale community. They agreed to do tile walls. I also told them I don’t want the tiles to stop at 6 feet. It looks like you ran out of tile. What they are going to do is tile right to the ceiling. All this takes a little bit more time so just letting you know.
Mr. Winfree: If that is going to happen so we don’t stretch out for a year and a half. Mr. Carney: I should be able to give you an update on it. I will shoot is over to Pat.
Mr. Shipe: They did do some work. They replaced the commodes. They have done some work.
Mr. Carney: The last notice I got they are waiting for a contractor proposal for the
tile.
Mr. Winfree: That makes more sense. Ok. You were on Number 6.
Mr. Burgess: Yes the signs are in powder coating. They should have one more
week. Once they are done. The install is going to be the ten poles for $1,700 to install. They are going to pick them up as well and we will get spots set for them to be installed and get that completed. I am still working with Comcast. They tried to meet with us when

our office was closed so we are getting another date. I believe they are claiming it is their damage we just need to met with them because they are going to rebuild that line. There is just some additional work to be done.
Mr. Winfree: So they have accepted that it is theirs now?
Mr. Burgess: I provided them pictures and based on that they are saying it is theirs. Mr. Winfree: Ok.
Mr. Burgess: Once I have the meeting date I will get you updated on that. Turtle Run Boulevard and NW 41st Street light pole damage everything was ordered. It looks like the fixtures and arms are shipping on the 24th and the pole delivery we don’t have a date set for that. The same thing for Turtle Creek Drive and the Shoppe light pole damage. The fixture arms are shipping and the pole they are probably going to ship those two together. Once we have a date we will update you all on that.
Mr. Winfree: So we will have the fixtures but not the poles.
Mr. Burgess: We already went over item #10 for the lank bank repair between Avana Apartments and number 11 with the action plan from KCI. The South Florida Water Management District compliance request we provided an update on that. They are working with us and are patient. Skip do you have any park upgrades that you want to go over?
Mr. Carney: A couple of things. They ordered the exercise equipment, and it did come in. There is six pieces of exercise equipment going under the tented area called the social area. The pavilion was just ordered this week. Lou told me that it takes ten weeks to manufacture the pavilion. At that point when the pavilion comes in they are going to pick up the basketball court and that is where the pavilion is going to go. The basketball court will be slated probably won’t be put in place until next year. Closer to the playground. That is pending budgets and all that whole stuff. Hopefully it will be done soon.
Mr. Burgess: Thank you. Moving onto #14. I think after the new year and a few things Pat, Jason and I will get out there and get the lake floating issues taken care of. It has taken the back burner with a few things popping up. Wiles Road – Creekside Drive pedestrian sign that was installed by Horsepower this past week. The sign is up. We have a few signs around the District that we have in stock now that either we can replace

them or have a vendor do it. It gets a little tricky up there as the frame disconnects from the sign itself. There are a few fading signs here and there that we are going to replace and just upgrade.
Mr. Winfree: Normal maintenance.
Mr. Burgess: I don’t have any updates for #16 or #17. If you have any questions just let me know.
Mr. Winfree: Do we have a mediation date yet?
Mr. Burgess: It has changed. We can email it out once we get closer to the date they provide.
Mr. Winfree: Any questions on anything?

ELEVENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS   Financial Reports
Approval of Check Register
Acceptance of Unaudited Financials
Mr. Winfree: Let’s talk about the financial reports. Any questions on the check register? Any discussion required? Everybody in agreement with that? Can I get a motion to approve the check register?

On MOTION by Mr. Carney seconded by Mr. Shipe with all in favor, the Check Register was approved.

Mr. Winfree: Anything on the unaudited financials?
Mr. Carney: Everything looks pretty good. We are only in the second month, so it is really hard to judge at this point.

TWELFTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Public Comments Mr. Winfree: Public comments, Clarence do you have anything? Mr. Lohman: No.
Mr. Winfree: Chris?
Mr. Kapish: Yes I do. Some of these signs and flagpoles that have been torn out there is trip hazards, and I think they need to be addressed especially the one on

Creekside and Wiles. Coning the hole is not securing the site. Putting dirt in the hole is. I understand that the sign is going to go back. If someone trips on that they are going to sue the District. The drone thing by BrightView the CDD doesn’t own very much property. They own the land underneath the street, the monument signs, the lakes and some of the powerlines and stuff but all along the boulevard the District doesn’t own them. That is city property. If somebody is walking on the sidewalk they are walking on city property. You guys need to consult the city about this drone. I know Mr. Clarence here might say that the Foundation Mr. Kapish was inaudible at this time. Actually the District doesn’t own much property. If you fly over the roundabout that is not District property. That is city property. It is a city road. Fly over the park, which is a city park. The businesses are all on private property. Quite honestly, I am not sure why BrightView would want to do it because the property is not kept up like it should. It hasn’t. All the trees underneath the powerlines were all supposed to be, it was in the contract I don’t know if you took it out but those were all supposed to be manicured not let grow to massive trees. If they were manicured you wouldn’t have the problems that we have now where we have these massive trees overgrown. That is the problem a lot of landscape is not kept up. It is not pruned where it should be especially at the main entrance and Turtle Run at the Estates. In fact there is not even enough lights on them right now because they have grown so much. That is it.
Mr. Burgess: Thank you Chris. Mr. Winfree: You have anything?

THIRTEENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS Supervisors Requests
Mr. Carney: Yes I do. A representative from the roundabout lighting they were out there the other night Patrick. I showed the guy whoever did our lighting at the roundabout looks like there was a representative out there a couple night ago so I stopped and talked to him but he didn’t speak much English so I couldn’t get through to him very well. He was counting the burnt-out bulbs. Must have been Luxe.
Mr. Burgess: Yes, I sent them a map of the lights that were out. It is taking them a little longer. They will give us a repair estimate if they are not under warranty but a lot of the lights that they have replaced in the past the last one that you guys approved are a

better product so a lot of them are staying on a lot longer. I am assuming the ones that are out are damaged. They will get back to us as soon as they have the report.
Mr. Carney: Pat the District is looking good. I just wanted to let you know that. Mr. Szozda: Thank you.
Mr. Carney: Thank you for your efforts. The bonus is well deserved. Mr. Burgess: Thank you.
Mr. Carney: That is all.
Mr. Winfree: Ken do you have anything? Mr. Murray: Nope.
Mr. Winfree: Rob?
Mr. Shipe: I have a couple of things. Patrick could you put up the pictures? Mr. Burgess: The three pictures?
Mr. Shipe: Yes. So I think as the Board of Supervisors we need to decide how we want to keep the upkeep of the District. I know these Stresscrete sign poles that have gone on for all the Shoppe signs and things like that. We spent a lot of money when they were put in, and I know they had ones that kind of looked like that but were metal and they faded then they went to these concrete ones. We have these No Parking signs now and some others I think we should decided either we are going to say we can put metal poles and kind of take away from it or we are going to say every time we put in a sign like that and I don’t know if that is required by the Department of Transportation or the city or who is saying that we have to put these multiple signs but I think we as a Board we need to decide a policy at least for now that every pole we put in we are going to replace with Stresscrete at the price or we are going to start having some metal poles, some concrete poles.
Mr. Winfree: Do we know how many of those there are? Mr. Shipe: I think there is six of those.
Mr. Geiger: There is more than that because it is on both sides. Mr. Burgess: I don’t believe we are allowed to change that.
Mr. Winfree: That was my next question.
Mr. Geiger: Those were installed during the signpost replacement project. I think the issue that came up is at the time the Coral Springs Police Department said without

those signs they can’t ticket people for standing, with the school letting out and everything. I think I want to say the city told us we had to put them in. At the time the District didn’t want to spend the money. Those concrete poles are expensive. I think when we were looking at it those small signs don’t look the most attractive on those bigger poles. My recollection is when we got the contract the District opted to put these on metal poles for now. Those poles are $2,000 or $3,000 a piece for the concrete one. It was a decision at the time by the Board that we were going to comply with what the City of Coral Springs Police Department and the city needed to enforce the rules there and we were going to put them on these poles. There were signs on metal poles like that for a long time and disappeared out of the District for some reason. That is why the city called to replace them. We couldn’t figure out who removed them. Again my recollection is they went in at the same time with the same contractor. I think Horsepower did it at the same time as the concrete poles, but it was a decision at the time not to buy 10 to 12 more concrete poles. I personally know I sent marked up drawings to the city trying to reduce the number of those because it is a lot. I believe this was the compromise where they said if you don’t have them in these areas we can’t enforce standing in the right-of-way rule or whatever which never made sense in me because you are not supposed to be stopping on the road anyways.
Mr. Shipe: My point would be that everybody the four of us that was not on the Board when this happened, and these decisions were made I would like not tonight but I would think about it maybe and at the next meeting or the meeting after we can kind of decide do we want to go to a policy.
Mr. Carney: I like idea, but I think what we should do is get a total number of how many of these types of signs we have in the District and see what we are dealing with. I think the idea is good.
Mr. Winfree: The only concern I have is you would have put Mr. Winfree was inaudible at this time because if one got damaged and put in it is like the other poles with a 6 to 9 month wait.
Mr. Shipe: The speed limit is broken which we are waiting on now. You do have to wait in the interim. I am not in any way suggesting that we buy extra to have laying around if something happens. I personally feel like we should replace them. If we have already

spent the money then we should have them all there. Maybe we will find out how many are on there and we can bring it up at another meeting.
Mr. Winfree: I guess my request would be from either one of you is how many are there or what would the pole cost, so we have an idea. Then we can make an educated decision on what we want to do going forward.
Mr. Shipe: My other point as we talked in the past about the nature trail and the lake signs we did have the opening of the pickleball courts the other day and I was speaking with the principal of the middle school. I brought up the idea of the nature trail in partnership with Forest Glen. She was very excited about it. They do have a nature club. I thought maybe we could work with them. Why should we do this? Improve the District. Make it a little nicer. Make use of the 21 existing signs that are scattered throughout the District and give the students of Forest Glen Middle School pride in their neighborhood and educate the District on the abundance of wildlife scattered throughout the neighborhood. We do have capital money that we talked about having different projects. I don’t think we really went forward with any of the stuff that we talked about, but we can use the money for capital improvements for the benefit of all the residents. We make use of the 21 existing signs and post throughout the District. There is probably five of the signs that people see. Most of them are in remote locations. Two of them got stolen off the posts. That map there on the bottom a lot of them are on the lakes. The lake names are not officially recorded like we talked about before. If you call 911 oh my goodness somebody has fallen into Lake Marie it is not registered. Nobody knows what that is. The District uses it, but they could use lake 10 or lake 12. That is how they used to be called. You could still call it that name. They just don’t need a signpost on there. Partnering with the students and the nature club you give the students pride in the neighborhood. People are proud of the neighborhood there is less vandalism, community support and family pride as the students bring their families out to show the projects. It would educate the District on the abundant wildlife that is scattered throughout Turtle Run between the birds and turtles and different things. The cost I don’t really know exactly what it would cost. I talked to Patrick at little bit back and forth on what it may cost to pull the poles up and then replace them. Maybe $500 to remove them and $500 for putting them in so about $1,000.  That is probably the main cost. We can get new signs,

fiberglass, UV resistant signs at $200 per pole which would have a picture of the animal in the center and then verbiage about the animal. It would be an approximate of $22,300 to do the project. I am not asking for a vote or anything. I just wanted to put it together. I don’t want to spend a whole lot of time with the school district if the Board thinks it is not a worthwhile project. I thought I would make the presentation and see what people’s thoughts were on it.
Mr. Winfree: I think it is very good. What would the next steps be? Mr. Carney: I like it.
Mr. Shipe: Well if we said that we think there is some support then I can partner with the school a little bit more and get a better handle on exactly what the cost to move the poles are and I can bring back a presentation, and we can see about actually approving the monies to do it.
Mr. Winfree: We don’t need a motion for that to just to move forward just come back with a quote more formalized proposal.
Mr. Burgess: We can definitely gather more information. We do have a massive project facing us so I think it is just important to get that information narrowed to see what additional monies you guys can spend. It is a very unknown number right now. We can definitely gather more information and bring it back.
Mr. Shipe: I think this project with the school would be the end of the year. The nature club it would be there project to decide which animals and the verbiage so the actual process would be a ways down the road. I just wanted to present it and see if there was support which I do think there is.
Mr. Carney: You talked about relocating the pole, but wouldn’t you want them on the trails going around the lakes?
Mr. Shipe: Yes. The two areas would be two sets of ten. One through the Passive Park and the other one along Turtle Creek along that waters edge so it is where people would go out for walks through the areas.
Mr. Winfree: The east and west side of the FPL. From a conceptual standpoint I think everyone is in agreement.
Mr. Shipe: Ok, thank you. That is all.
Mr. Winfree: Ginny do you have anything?

Ms. Tropea: No, I am good.
Mr. Winfree: I don’t have anything but the only thing I would like to do is thank everybody. It has been a pretty good year. The District is in pretty good shape. Everyone has been doing a great job this year. Enjoy the holiday season and we will start again at the beginning of next year. I just need a motion to adjourn.

FOURTEENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS Adjournment

On MOTION by Mr. Carney seconded by Mr. Murray with all in favor, the meeting was adjourned.

Assistant Secretary/Secretary	Chairman/Vice Chairman

Certificate Of Completion

Envelope Id: FA98FDE0-8BF6-452D-BEDA-68BB669409E7	Status: Completed Subject: Turtle Run: Complete with Docusign: 11-24-25 Minutes.pdf
Source Envelope:
Document Pages: 26	Signatures: 2	Envelope Originator:
Certificate Pages: 2	Initials: 0	Ellen Acosta

AutoNav: Enabled
EnvelopeId Stamping: Enabled
Time Zone: (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada)

1001 Bradford Way
Kingston, TN 37763 eacosta@gmssf.com
IP Address: 162.199.192.217

Record Tracking

Status: Original
2/26/2026 1:22:42 PM

Holder: Ellen Acosta
eacosta@gmssf.com

Location: DocuSign

Signer Events	Signature	Timestamp

Barry W. Winfree bjwinfree@outlook.com Chairman
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
(None)	Signature Adoption: Pre-selected Style
Using IP Address: 187.157.96.234

Sent: 2/26/2026 1:23:50 PM Viewed: 2/26/2026 2:07:26 PM Signed: 2/26/2026 2:07:52 PM

Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Not Offered via Docusign

Patrick Burgess		Sent: 2/26/2026 1:23:50 PM	
pburgess@gmssf.com		Viewed: 2/26/2026 1:28:16 PM	
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication (None)	

Signature Adoption: Pre-selected Style	Signed: 2/26/2026 1:28:42 PM	
	Using IP Address: 162.199.192.217		
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Not Offered via Docusign			
In Person Signer Events	Signature	Timestamp	
			
Editor Delivery Events	Status	Timestamp	
			
Agent Delivery Events	Status	Timestamp	
			
Intermediary Delivery Events	Status	Timestamp	
			
Certified Delivery Events	Status	Timestamp	
			
Carbon Copy Events	Status	Timestamp	
			
Witness Events	Signature	Timestamp	
			
Notary Events	Signature	Timestamp	
			
Envelope Summary Events	Status	Timestamps	
Envelope Sent	Hashed/Encrypted	2/26/2026 1:23:51 PM	
Certified Delivered	Security Checked	2/26/2026 1:28:16 PM	
Signing Complete	Security Checked	2/26/2026 1:28:42 PM	

Envelope Summary Events	Status	Timestamps	
Completed	Security Checked	2/26/2026 2:07:52 PM	
Payment Events	Status	Timestamps