MINUTES OF MEETING TURTLE RUN
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT

A regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the Turtle Run Community Development District was held on Monday, August 25, 2025, at 6:00 p.m. at the Coral Bay Recreation Center, 3101 South Bay Drive, Margate, Florida.

Present and constituting a quorum:
Barry Winfree	Chairman
Skip Carney	Vice Chairman
Virginia Tropea	Assistant Secretary
Kenneth Murray	Assistant Secretary Also present were:
Patrick Burgess	District Manager
Scott Cochran	District Counsel
Jonathan Geiger	District Engineer
Pat Szozda	Governmental Management Services
Julio Tejeda	South Florida Water Management Residents

FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS	Roll Call
Mr. Burgess called the meeting to order and called the roll.

SECOND ORDER OF BUSINESS	Moment of Silence
Mr. Winfree led a moment of silence.
THIRD ORDER OF BUSINESS	Pledge of Allegiance
Mr. Winfree led the Pledge of Allegiance.
FOURTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Good News
Mr. Winfree: First item is good news. Other than rain I think everybody is happy that we got a couple of inches. Got anything?
Mr. Carney: No thank you. Mr. Winfree: Gin?
Ms. Tropea: No.
Mr. Winfree: I will pass. Ken?

Mr. Murray: Nothing from me.
FIFTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Approval of the minutes of the
July 28, 2025, Meeting
Mr. Winfree: Approval of the minutes for the July 28, 2025, meeting which is on page 4. Can I get a motion?

On MOTION by Mr. Carney seconded by Mr. Murray with all in favor, the Minutes of the July 28, 2025, Meeting were approved.

SIXTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Consideration of:
First Amendment to Amend and Restated Services Agreement (Holiday Landscape Lighting) with Rileighs Outdoor, LLC
Small Project Agreement (Stormwater Drain Cleaning and Repair with Industrial Divers Corp. Inc.
Mr. Winfree: The first item is the consideration of the First Amendment for the holiday landscape. One thing I did notice or maybe I didn’t write it correct or whatever the lights were supposed to remain lit not through January 7th but through the 6th and off for the 7th. Can we make that change and put a motion together to approve everything else that we have made changes on?
Mr. Carney: Motion to approve based on changes.

On MOTION by Mr. Carney seconded by Mr. Murray with all in favor, the First Amendment to Amend and Restated Services Agreement (Holiday Landscape Lighting) with Rileighs Outdoor, LLC with the change by Mr. Barry Winfree was approved.

Mr. Winfree: The Small Project Agreement for the stormwater cleaning and repair with Industrial Divers Corp. that is the proposal. Do you want to take a minute and explain where we are, or do you want me to?
Mr. Burgess: At the last meeting I mistakenly said that site #15 was not our responsibility and it is. I was mixing it up with the line item on the bottom, the lake in between PetSmart and Walmart. To confirm that everything on that proposal is the

District’s responsibility to clean based on Industrial Divers recommendation we brought it back to the Board with everything under the one agreement and want approval based off of what the maintenance was suggested from Industrial Divers are.
Mr. Winfree: Let me just ask a question. Site #1 we are not doing right? Comcast is responsible for that.
Mr. Burgess: Yes, site #1 Comcast is the company that bored through the culvert, so we are communicating with them on the repairs. Industrial Divers will do the repairs, but we are just making sure that Comcast pays for them and the District does not. Site #12 the section under the road between Turtle Run Boulevard basically we are responsible for the interconnecting pipes to the lakes and then the city has already been out to clean the catch basins. You have one quote already. We are just trying to get additional quotes to make sure you get the best costs. Just waiting on that. Then the last one like I said is not the District’s responsibility.
Mr. Winfree: The second site #15 that belongs to PetSmart. Right now, we are going to approve everything except for the second site #12 correct.
Mr. Burgess: Correct.
Mr. Winfree: Then we are still waiting for that second bid for that one. Mr. Burgess: We will bring that back to the Board.
Mr. Winfree: Any questions or anything on that? Can I get a motion to approve?

On MOTION by Mr. Carney seconded by Mr. Murray with all in favor, the Small Project Agreement with Industrial Divers Corp, Inc. for stormwater drain cleaning and repairs was approved.

SEVENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Acceptance of Audit for Fiscal
Year Ending on September 30, 2024
Mr. Winfree: The acceptance of the audit for fiscal year ending September 30, 2024. I know that was a lot to read. The best part was when it said that we did good and we are ok. As long as Jennifer says we are ok we are good

Mr. Burgess: She said it is a clean audit. We just need a motion to accept the audit for fiscal year ending on September 30, 2024.

On MOTION by Mr. Carney seconded by Mr. Murray with all in favor, the Acceptance of the Audit for Fiscal Year ending September 30, 2024 was approved.

EIGHTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Consideration of Engagement
Letter with Grau & Associates to perform the Audit for Fiscal Year Ending September 30, 2025
Mr. Winfree: Consideration of the engagement letter with Grau & Associates for next year. It is pretty straightforward.
Mr. Carney: They have been our audit company now for the last ten or more years. Mr. Winfree: It is the same company. They have been doing a good job for us.
Mr. Carney: GMS uses them on a lot of different Districts. Mr. Winfree: Can I get a motion?

On MOTION by Mr. Carney seconded by Mr. Murray with all in favor, the Engagement Letter with Grau & Associates to perform the Audit for Fiscal Year Ending September 30, 2025 was approved.

NINTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Discussion of:
District Rules
Mr. Winfree: The first item up for discussion is the stormwater management areas. I know that Mike said that we need to define what that means more. I don’t know how we do that. Maybe you could help us with that Scott. Basically, this is mostly about the lakes. That is what the storm management is so how do we define it any further than that?
Mr. Cochran: Well, I think it is capitalized term. Typically, that would be capitalized like that because it has been defined. We would just need to define either with reference

to a map or with reference to a description of exactly the areas we are talking about are so that whenever that term stormwater management area is used in there it is very clear exactly what is included and what is not included within that definition.
Mr. Winfree: Can we put something together then that defines what this area is that we are putting the rules for. Basically, it is what we call the lakes except for the two that are not ours which is the one for Walmart and one for PetSmart?
Mr. Burgess: Yes.
Mr. Winfree: Just put that together and say that is what we are defining here. I don’t know how we want to do this. Has everyone had a chance to read through, and I won’t look for a motion or anything right now but more of discussion. Is there anything more or less that we think we need to have in here? Anybody have any suggestions on adding or deleting anything? Like I said before I don’t think you were here. Basically, for lack of a better term almost plagiarized Coral Bay and took a few things out and added a few things in like we don’t have a boat ramp. We don’t have any motorized or those types of things and kind of defined everything. The only other thing I added was no floating devices which seems to be what we have talked about several times also.
Mr. Carney: I have one thing I would like to change. I like all the items I think they are well written. No gas-powered engines I totally agree with that. Although people have been using electric for the last 20 years. I agree about the electric. People have been using the electric for 20 years and it is not invasive.
Mr. Winfree: Anything else? Everybody agree on putting electric back in. Mr. Murray: I am curious what would be the opposition to the electric ones?
Mr. Winfree: I will answer that from my perspective. I didn’t think we should, electric motors have gotten much more powerful and much faster now. I haven’t seen any out there. I kind of split hairs between just having electric with no motors. I don’t know. I could flip a coin either way myself.
Mr. Carney: I have lived on the lake for 30 years now and I haven’t seen any issues.
They putt around. It is a non-issue.
Mr. Winfree: Is that the only change that anyone sees? I will make that change. I don’t think we want to do a motion right now. I will make the change and bring it back.
Mr. Cochran: We have to go through the rule-making process.

Mr. Winfree: It is going to take awhile so if there anything else from a legal standpoint that we need to make. I will make the electric change to pull that all out. I will send it off to you, you can send it back and we will talk about it. Maybe we can find out a little bit more what the process is going forward to make that happen.
Website – Service Page
Mr. Winfree: Alright website services. Let’s talk about that. A quick update. Patrick you put most of this together on updating what was currently on the website.
Mr. Burgess: Yes, tweaking some sentences here and there. I don’t know what direction you guys want on the website as far as pictures of the playground or the entrance monuments. There is just older pictures on there. It is whatever you guys would like. I didn’t make any significant changes just tweaked some things and removed items that aren’t currently being serviced. I just want some feedback on what you guys want.
Mr. Winfree: The only thing that I noticed besides defining what we want as pictures or so is the Turtle Run consists of 18 lakes. I always understood we were 14 lakes, and I don’t know if that counts the two or not.
Mr. Carney: That was my question also.
Mr. Winfree: I am not sure, but I think a couple of the lakes have two names depending on which side of the lake it is on. There might be 16 names out there. Is that where the 18 came from plus the two?
Mr. Carney: Pat how many lakes are there? Mr. Szozda: There is 14 lakes.
Mr. Burgess: Some lakes have Katie and Justine are one lake. The same thing with Haley and Margaret so 16 named lakes but 14 lakes. I can make that change.
Mr. Winfree: The rest of it all looked, there were some slight changes like I noticed we took the banners out. It looked good for me for what the rewrite was except for the number of lakes. Does anybody have anything else?
Mr. Carney: I would have to look at it some more.
Mr. Burgess: I can add updated pictures and put them on there for you guys and bring them back for the next meeting.
Mr. Winfree: Any suggestions on what we want to put in there as far as pictures are concerned or just let him take a first stab at it and we will go from there.

Ms. Tropea: Let him take a stab. Mr. Winfree: Alright.
No Trespassing Sign Map
Mr. Winfree: The next item is the No Trespassing sign map. I did get one feedback on that. The one thing that is being recommended is that the two signs on the west side of the FP&L easement
Mr. Burgess: I can bring it up on the screen.
Mr. Winfree: Those two right there, Skip is recommending that those two not be there. To me the only reason but Skip is saying there is a fence maybe I missed that, runs behind those houses there.
Mr. Szozda: There is. A split rail fence.
Mr. Winfree: It runs the whole back? So, is there a reason to have those two then?
Mr. Szozda: I think the division between private property and the lakes is pretty clear back there.
Mr. Carney: That just goes into an open lake. Mr. Winfree: I don’t understand.
Mr. Carney: The other sign, No Trespassing sign, goes into an open lake. There are no homes back there.
Mr. Winfree: The one that is on this side but that is still just a walk-through. The same thing we are going to talk about on the next one. The next one is over at the east side of the FP&L easement the one new one. The reason that was added was to keep anybody from walking down there. There is nothing separating those houses from Newport or the Estates from that side of the FP&L easement. What we’re saying is we would cut that off completely so that no one could just walk down that south side and then take one of the landmarks across. Does that make sense? That is the reason it is there. Skip brought up a point also is that taking that one out and I think it was because some people do walk through there.
Mr. Carney: A lot of people walk through there. We are adding ten. If we need a couple more we add them later.
Mr. Winfree: The biggest thing is to keep the people from walking behind people’s homes.

Mr. Carney: I agree with that.
Mr. Winfree: I don’t know do we wait and see if anybody else complains. I know I have heard calls especially from my wife because of the roundabout people just walk down that bank or cut right through the houses there and pick fruit as they walk through. They actually have worn a path through there since they have walked through there so much. I think what we are trying to do is keep people from walking through people’s backyards.
Mr. Carney: I agree with that.
Mr. Winfree: Are we saying then that we should take the two on both the left-hand side of the easement down and take that other one down? The whole idea of all of them was to keep people from going behind those houses and if you let them walk down that easement if we are going to take that one off then we might as well take the other side off. It was to keep anybody from walking down and then just walking across the five areas.
Mr. Carney: No matter what we do it is not going to be 100%. Why don’t we start with something and then we can add later.
Mr. Winfree: So, are we taking those two off and see if we have a problem behind the Estates and Newport?
Mr. Murray: I would say we take those off.
Mr. Winfree: If we are going to take one side off then there is no sense keeping the other one up. Any other discussion or should we just start and get these up the sooner the better?
Mr. Carney: There is no additional cost. We only pay for each pole.
Mr. Winfree: So, we just put those poles in that we have identified taking four off of what this map says. Can we get a motion on that or is there anything else we need to do since we already have some up? I assume we are safe to put the rest of them up.
Mr. Cochran: Do you know the amount?
Mr. Winfree: We will put a motion up. We were adding 14 and we are adding 10
now.
Mr. Burgess: You could do a not to exceed. Mr. Carney: How much for each pole?
Mr. Burgess: I think it was like the high $3,000 for three signs. I will have to check.

Mr. Carney: A little over a $1,000 a pole.
Mr. Burgess: Maybe a not to exceed $15,000 to be safe. I am sure the cost has gone up.
Mr. Winfree: The $15,000 should cover even if we have to put the extras in right? We are only going to put 10 in now and that will leave us the space to get the other four if we need it with the $15,000.

On MOTION by Mr. Carney seconded by Mr. Murray with all in favor, a not to exceed amount of $15,000 to install 10 No Trespassing signs was approved.

TENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Staff Reports
Attorney
Mr. Winfree: You are up Scott. Do you have anything?
Mr. Cochran: Not too much. I spoke to Mike. The only item I think we are still waiting for the city to sign the agreement for the bathroom renovations that we discussed and approved at the last meeting. We are still waiting on an executed copy of that.
Mr. Winfree: They agreed to it, right? All it is, is a matter of signatures now, right? Mr. Burgess: Yes.
Mr. Cochran: Nothing else unless any of you have any questions.
Mr. Carney: They are preparing to move on the restrooms in October. Hopefully we will get it done soon.
Engineer
Mr. Geiger: It is nice to see everybody. It has been a couple of months. It is nice to meet the new Board member. I am going to start with the Turtle Creek Drive flagpole that was installed. That permit is now closed out. I believe they just have to remove their permit box from the site. The electrical is also done from what I understand. The flagpole has been restored. The city final is as of the 20th of this month. I know at the last couple of meetings I submitted some information on the Terrapin Lane paver area that the Board approved the design on a couple months back. Patrick let me know that the Board was looking for pricing before moving forward with the city request for an updated survey to consider the DRC package. I put some numbers together. They seemed awfully high for

this small a project which is based on some historical costs we have. I did reach out to a couple of contractors and as of right now for that to get built you would have a cost of
$30,549 based on current design which hasn’t been approved by DRC or the city yet. Then KCI cost to get that through DRC, permitting and to update the survey for the requirements in the city we are looking at an additional $8,791.63. That would bring the total moving forward to an estimated project cost at $41,340.63. That is based on only one proposal that I got back from a contractor. I am waiting on 3 more. Like I said, the first step is the city needs an updated survey. We have to get into DRC with the city is like a pre-application to building permits. That is going to require a $700 fee for the city to review and then just a little bit of KCI’s time to put forms and stuff together in a package for that. If they come back with any revisions necessary this is the money I said would cover the revisions to the plans and then just the permitting assistance with what contractor is selected. I am waiting on three other quotes. I reached out to Mr. Geiger was inaudible at this time. who we have used before. She hasn’t gotten back to me. As well as Stanford Construction who we have used in the past and 3D Paving who we have also used in the past. A couple of contractors that we are familiar, but I only have the one that called back so far. That is how we are looking there. If you do want to move forward I do need to get the survey update approved. I believe that it was $3,650 that Patrick presented a month or two ago now. The DRC process generally takes a month or two if not more. I know we are doing some work over there right now, but I think that it is going to be long gone before we have anything in the ground. We do need to strap the brick pavers on this so when we come back in and maybe do some more lake bank work eventually the pavers should be able to handle rubber tracks and stuff like that.
Mr. Winfree: If I added up what you were saying it is right under $42,000. Mr. Geiger: $41,340.63.
Mr. Winfree: Plus, the extra you were talking about. That includes everything else.
Mr. Geiger: Yes. Now if this project takes six months to do any construction there might be a change in the cost. I do have the build in 10% contingency into this. Normally when a contractor doesn’t use that they don’t bill it. It might be a little cheaper.
Mr. Winfree: My feeling is, and I can be swayed either way is that we hold this at this point and see what it is going to cost us for the lake banks to see if we want to hold

this back to make sure we can do the lake banks. I know it is not anywhere close to what the lake banks are going to be. Do we want to spend that much right now with everything else?
Mr. Carney: I agree. Ms. Tropea: Yes.
Mr. Winfree: Thank you for all the work and everything. We have an idea of what it is, and I think we can make a determination further down the road once we get the rest of the information.
Mr. Geiger: If the Board ever down the road wants to pursue the DRC that is something we have to anyways so we can always get that step out of the way and shelf it till we have more of idea of funding for the lake bank and everything. I will keep these numbers and if I get a couple more proposals I will just update the Board and let them know if we find a cheaper contractor so we can get a better idea of what it could potentially cost.
Mr. Winfree: Ok.
Mr. Geiger: Let’s move onto the lake banks. Survey has been done for all the actual work out in the field for the lake slide slope remediation for quick a while now. I just started getting some of the office CAD work back for the sections and the plans and profiles. We are currently taking a look at phase 1. There were some issues with the survey that they needed to correct specifically where you have the geo-tubes. Our survey shows it slopes like this when in reality it is a stepdown. So, for us to really analyze this, I am drawing our section lines on there and everything is kind of technically correct but the survey didn’t pick up some information or they just need to fix the office work. I am going to sit down with them tomorrow and get that all figured out. I believe they want to try to get us a completed phases 1, 2, and 3 this year. Survey-wise per our agreement with South Florida Water Management we are on the hook just to complete phase 1 construction by the end of next year. For the timeline we are in design for the two bigger lakes and the residential areas between now and estimated everything to be kind of completed and approved design-wise by June of next year so we can get into construction hopefully after the rainy season and get everything completed for those two lakes by December 31st of next year. We are making some headway with those. I right now don’t have the direction

as a far how we are going to accomplish this. KCI might need to talk with a specialty contractor like Landshore or a contractor in general. This is the first time I have ever seen a geo-tube getting corrected or potentially having to get ripped out and the shoreline being done. These lakes are really big. You can’t pump these lakes down without a whole lot of effort. There is going to be some trial and error of design to try to see what is going to work best. We don’t have a lot of room behind some of those properties. Some areas are better than others. This is going to be a little touch and go here with these first two ones. After we figure this out the next phases are either cut and paste or easier because we don’t have the massive amount of geo-tubes that we have.
Mr. Winfree: I know that we were given the direction to try and go after the residential areas first but after thinking about it I was more concerned with the open areas where we have the walkways. Those scare me more because most of the people that have lived on the lakes forever know to stay away from the lakes or not to fall into the lakes. Those other areas are much higher risk in my opinion overall.
Mr. Geiger: I get the open access it does seem like it is a higher risk, but these slopes are a lot less adverse there. With the geo-tubes you have a drop-off. Some of these people don’t have fences in their backyards. That makes it a little bit more adverse. That is how I thought of it. If you have a small child or someone who is physically capable of pulling himself out of pool those geo-tubes really do create a hard edge. The lake is not very deep in some places and in other places it is hard to determine where the bottom is really.
Mr. Winfree: What concerned me was that especially Turtle Run Boulevard where we had that long way with all the geo-tubes and everything. Most of the residents are not going to have strangers in their backyard, people visiting or whatever. Those other areas are all open. That is what we built those open walkways for.
Mr. Geiger: Those are less adverse slopes and less drop-off. Mr. Winfree: So, they are a little safer at this point.
Mr. Geiger: Yes. With the couple of meetings with South Florida they did stress that we needed to address the areas closest to the residential units first. That was the direction from them. That is why we are fixing the area of erosion near the apartments right now. I don’t have a lot else to report on the master plan here. Hopefully next month

we will have a little bit more analysis done and maybe start getting some ideas or brainstorms of what to do. Like I said this might be something where we do an analysis and get with a company like Landshore that I looked at their website and there is some technology that I never heard of as an engineer that they specialize in and do. Sometimes it is easier to let a contractor come up with an idea and manage them than it is to hold them to what we want.
Mr. Winfree: I believe that Coral Bay went through something very similar to this recently?
Mr. Geiger: No, they are dealing with separate issues for building seawalls on a
canal.
Mr. Winfree: When I was looking through their stuff, their rules and stuff, they got
like three different processes.
Mr. Geiger: Those were specifically for the lakes over here. That is stuff that KCI put together. They went through a whole rule change thing. They put the ownness on their owners though to restore. Some of that might be applicable but the two methods that most people use are the lime rock rip rap and the sandbags. I don’t think we are going to put lime rock rip rap or sandbags on every lake. The other technique that we have on restore line restoration is almost like a geo-tube. If you look at it, it is filling in a geo type style woven fabric around it and over it.
Mr. Winfree: Does that actually hold?
Mr. Geiger: If it is done correct but you still might wind up with that hard edge. It works a little better there because their lake falls off.
Mr. Winfree: Very quick.  Ok. Just throwing that out there.
Mr. Geiger: We are doing our due diligence on trying to figure out what is going to be the affordable more permanent solution than obviously what the District has installed in the past and see going forward in the future, so we don’t have to do this every ten to twenty years. Landshore has all sorts of concrete mats that help the erosion and stuff that we can take a look at.
Mr. Winfree: Ok. Anybody else have any questions?
Mr. Carney: When are we going to get an estimated cost of this project?

Mr. Geiger: There is not going to be an estimate for the total cost. Each lake is going to be different. I want to say the goal of this is every year we were going to provide a design, go out for bid, and get proposals. The two big lakes that we are looking at now are going to be completely different beasts than the next phase, which is that big, long lake that is almost like six different lakes. That is going to be a completely different ball game too because there is no access. I couldn’t give you a ballpark right now Skip unfortunately.
Mr. Carney: This is an assumption. You could probably assume all the FPL lakes are going to be similar.
Mr. Geiger: Yes for the most part.
Mr. Carney: Because they are all about the same size, same problems.
Mr. Geiger: The lake that size that we addressed, I think two of those lakes is about the size of one we did was like $500,000. It is going to be about $1,000,000 or $1,500,000 based on that but I also had a contractor doing three of them at once. I don’t have a comfortable number to give the District on that in totality yet.
Mr. Winfree: Which lake do you think I don’t know if you know at this point, we are supposed to go after the residential areas, is that Hidden Lake, Newport and the Estates or is that more down in the apartments.
Mr. Geiger: Phase 1 as we approved it and agreed upon is the two lakes up at the Estates and Hidden Lake. That is where we are focusing on right now. Phase 2 is just that big, long skinny lake that goes through all the apartments.
Mr. Winfree: The two lakes up top are Phase 1 and that one down there is Phase
2.
Mr. Geiger: Yes. These in my opinion are going to be the most expensive that we
will deal with. From there we will move down to the little, tiny lakes which should be, some of them might not need anything done. I hope that we have more areas that don’t need to be addressed. In the dry season a contractor could have fixed that. Put some dirt in there and compact that. We are probably going to look at littoral plantings as well just for the stability of the soil and erosion control.
Mr. Carney: Is a lot of it just merely excavation?

Mr. Geiger: Distance wise no because more of the shoreline has the geo-tubes or no shoreline to basically work with. A lot of the FPL easement is going to be grading I think.
Mr. Carney: In the process is there a Cadillac, Chevrolet or Volkswagen process in this whole thing? How does that work?
Mr. Geiger: That is what I would like to look at. That is why I would like a company like Landshore, or similar contractor would probably know alternative solutions. That is one way to do this instead of KCI. I would have to spend a whole lot of time to come up with three whole different designs especially on some of these lakes, but it is something we can look at.
Mr. Carney: So, when you put that out to bid you will be able to look at it.
Mr. Geiger: My practice has worked with a CDD that went through this, and the engineering firm didn’t really do any design. The District put out a proposal and asked for contractors to submit their design and how they were going to address it. Obviously they gave different methods, and it is hard to compare apples to apples but at this point we are looking at what is affordable and a permanent reasonable solution. There is a different way to go about this. It is going to take some analysis to see what we can do and how we should approach this.
Mr. Winfree: If we come up with a scope of work then it should be a lot easier to compare what everyone is putting in. They may not do it the same way but at least we will know the finished project what we want they should be able to come back.
Mr. Geiger: Yes.
Mr. Winfree: What are you going to do because not knowing what they are going to do to your point is this going to last five years, ten years, twenty years. You can go out there and fix that probably for half the cost but next year it is going to look like crap again. It depends on how it is done.
Mr. Geiger: And that is part of the reason this is going to be a little difficult. We can certainly push dirt under water, but you can’t compact it. You are going to run into this problem again in five years.
Mr. Winfree: Any other questions?

Mr. Geiger: Just a quick update on the repair we are doing by Avana Apartments that track that Landshore is doing for us right now. They started doing that work two weeks ago. They started excavating. Where we believe there was a collapsed outfall, and that mitered end section turns out that was just construction debris that was started there. That pipe is a lot deeper. Landshore was provided this information. They misread the design plans. Their scope of work is going to change. The change order reflects the new cost not an additional cost. I believe it is a reduction of $9,300.87. That is because at this point we have the divers out there checking the pipe right now to make sure we are not fixing the shoreline and having to fix the pipe. If they don’t have to do anything with this pipe, it removes the pipe fix and the material cost for that. Instead of digging up pipe and replacing it and putting a head wall in they would just be reshaping and regrading that shoreline. At the end of the day, we are under the cost of $50,000 that was estimated for this.
Mr. Winfree: Pat you weren’t out there diving with them to get the answers to that? Mr. Szozda: I spoke to the gentleman today and he thinks they located the pipe,
but they were removing debris from the top of it. There was a hard structure there he believed the pipe but there some dirt built on it. They were pumping it out. Did you talk to them today? That was around noon. He goes we may or may not get to it today. I know for a fact there is debris built up in that pipe.
Mr. Geiger: They are working on it. I think some of these pipe outfalls doing this lank bank restoration stuff we might want to check them and everything. Some of the stuff that is actually in the easement and in the lake I believe the District needs to be responsible for clearing out. It stuff we need to address during the maintenance of actual lakes over the next couple of years.
Mr. Winfree: All the HOA’s, a lot of the businesses all have their storm drains. Who is responsible for what? Do we take over once it hits the lakes sort of speak? Who is responsible to clean these drains that are all blocked up like inside the shopping center.
Mr. Geiger: I have always understood that the District is responsible for the outfalls, the lakes and perhaps the portion of pipe in the easements. Some of the permits for South Florida are under the master permit for Turtle Run but you guys aren’t an operating entity. I think the apartments and Lowe’s and stuff like that.

Mr. Winfree: The shopping center they are the worst.
Mr. Geiger: Even though the road right-of-way has to be cleaned that is the District responsibility, but the city does it because it is the right-of-way. There never been a clear in my head the maintenance responsibility. I have always been told the District calls the city up and they have no problem coming and cleaning the catch basin.
Mr. Winfree: I know for Hidden Lake we pay to have that thing cleaned all the way out to through the lake not stopping at the lake and the rest belongs to the District.
Mr. Geiger: I think one of the quotes I got recently the contractor said it no price for us to clean the actual 100 feet of pipe.
Mr. Winfree: Once he has it there. We have been doing all the way out.
Mr. Geiger: A lot of private entities don’t jet the pipes out they suck it out and everything. Mr. Geiger was inaudible at this time.
Mr. Winfree: Anything else? I have asked enough questions.
Field Manager – Annual Maintenance Plan
Mr. Szozda: Just a couple of things. We did a full inspection of the lights in Turtle Run. There is a couple of culvert lights out. We had one flood light out and we are having some issues with the lighting from Sample Road and to the right. I don’t know if anybody noticed. They were out one night. Then we got them back on and they were on for the day, but Patrick got an electrician out there and they replaced three lights, so everything is in working order now. We did have two main line breaks one in Cumberland Farms and one at the Target Plaza that have been fixed. Tree trimming is in order to start next week. That is what I have.
Mr. Winfree: The one thing that I did see on here is meeting with CDI to review Christmas decoration changes. I thought we had already done all that.
Mr. Carney: There is drive-through Pat on Tuesday, September 2nd if you want to go with me.
Mr. Szozda: I will.
Mr. Carney: If you are available. The Estates this year had requested that we do their entrances this year since we have done Harbor Island and Hidden Lakes and all the other entrances. They are requesting that we do their three small entrances this year. It shouldn’t be very much.

Mr. Winfree: We are just talking about the Christmas palms? We are just talking about 12. Is there four at each one?
Mr. Carney: Yes. We will just take a look at that and get a cost.
Mr. Winfree: That was the only thing I noticed. I do have one other. What is the inground valve box inspection that we need to do next month?
Mr. Szozda: That is basically where all the sprinkler controls are. We do enough inspections of those.
Mr. Winfree: That is what I thought.
Mr. Szozda: That is pretty standard. We are in and out of the boxes constantly. Mr. Winfree: Ok.
Manager – Progress Report
Mr. Burgess: The change order that was passed onto you guys we do need approval for that change order.
Mr. Winfree: Alright. Everybody has read it, and we talked about it enough. Can I get a motion?

On MOTION by Mr. Murray seconded by Mr. Carney with all in favor, a change order #1 from Landshore Enterprises in the amount of $9,300.87 was approved.

Mr. Burgess: We talked about the park bathroom renovations. The agreement should be sent by the city to you Barry through DocuSign.
Mr. Winfree: I signed that.
Mr. Burgess: I will check in on it. We discussed the No Trespass signs and the Industrial Divers. The light pole damaged on Turtle Run Boulevard and they removed the pole. We ordered a new pole as well the Turtle Creek Drive light pole at the shops center across from Lowe’s. They moved the fixture from Turtle Run Boulevard to that fixture and it is working but we are going to replace both poles and the necessary equipment on it.
Mr. Szozda: That pole still has a very slight tilt to it.
Mr. Burgess: They are approved. We will see how fast they can get them to us. We discussed the lank bank repair for the Avana Apartments for the change order. The action

plan Jonathan discussed the lank bank survey as well. The park upgrades I believe Skip has something.
Mr. Carney: I handed out a copy out to the Board and Pat and Patrick received a copy. I will review it quickly. Number 1 the pickle ball courts, and the tennis courts are currently being resurfaced, three tennis courts and six pickle ball courts. The existing fence will remain as it is. Resurfacing will consist of 2 inches of black acrylic with a fiberglass topping. All being striped upon completion. They started working on it the past week sometime and they stopped. The asphalt that was there was ok. They just have to do some patches to it before they can put a surface on top of it. Beach volleyball courts and existing railroad ties have been removed. That has been completed. In the social area a new canopy has been installed. The area will be used as a social area with the addition of park benches and exercise equipment. The parking lot is being resurfaced. New curbing is being poured to replace old broke curbing. The playset is completed and a new black vinyl coated fence has been installed. Stamped concrete pathway is still part of the program. of the program. Although for the short run the paver pathway to the playset and around the park will be maintained and utilized at this time. Court lighting they are looking at putting possible lighting into the budget for 2026. They are still working on a possiblity of solar lighting for that area. The existing basketball courts will be removed to make room for the new pavillon. A new basketball court will be in the city’s 2026 budget to be placed close to the school on the west side of the park. Survellience cameras will be in the city’s budget. The goal is to have cameras in all city parks in 2026. Irrigation I talked with Lou Goldstein and Pat will you follow up with your guys over there, they are working on the irrigation.
Mr. Szozda: I talked to Danny today actually.
Mr. Carney: They did some but they didn’t do it all.
Mr. Szozda: I think most of it according to him is complete. I think there were some areas on the new field that might not be getting the necessary irrigation. He is well aware of what is going on over there.
Mr. Carney: The new pavillon pad will be poured shortly after removal of the baseketball court and the new pavillon will be twice the size of the old one 40 by 20 feet. The restrooms will start to be renovated in October. That is that. So far so good.

Mr. Burgess: Thank you. The lake floating devices we will have that completed as soon as possible. The flagpole has been completed. In October we should have the pedestrian crosswalk sign on Creekside Drive that will be installed. Nothing further with the fountain repairs and the Dennis Baldis memorial. The roundabout lake fountain it is being looked at. It just had a wire that burnt out just in case anyone sees that not working. We did call Hall Fountains today. They are checking it out.
Mr. Szozda: Hopefully by the end of the week we will get that straightened out.
Mr. Winfree: Ok. Will Matthew come back since they have done the deposition now with Anzco like he did last time when they were done with Peacock?
Mr. Burgess: We can find out.
Mr. Winfree: See if he is coming back with an update from that. I know there was a lot of information at that last deposition.
Mr. Murray: We need him to come back so we can as a Board figure out what our position is going to be moving forward because it may have changed now.
Mr. Winfree: We need a copy of the transcripts and then have him come back and talk to us and see what we want to do.
Mr. Burgess: Sounds good.
Mr. Winfree: You are going to keep me advised on that with the bathroom renovations, there is not much more I can do on the signature from the city. We really need to make sure that thing goes through because according to them they can’t move any further until they agree to that agreement. We don’t want that to be pushed back any further. Is that everything?
Mr. Burgess: Yes.

ELEVENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Financial Reports
Approval of Check Register
Acceptance of Unaudited Financials
Mr. Winfree: Financial reports. Has everybody gone through the financial reports?
Any comments on any of that? Can I get a motion to approve the check register?

On MOTION by Mr. Carney seconded by Mr. Murray with all in favor, the Check Register was approved.

Mr. Winfree: The acceptance of the unaudited financials. We don’t have to motion that, but it looks good to me. I didn’t see anything out of order.

TWELFTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Public Comments
Mr. Winfree: Public comments. Two things actually the public comments, not a question-and-answer period, and we are going to hold you to the three minutes. Let’s open it up for public comments. Who wants to go first for public comments?
Mr. Tejeda: My name is Julio Tejeda. I am with South Florida Water Management District. I just came out today to introduce myself to you guys. I am new to the District. I just moved up from Miami-Dade County. I am intergovernmental affairs, communications between different agencies. I am happy to hear that you guys are already working with some of us. Anything that you guys might need from our end if you are having a little bit of tougher issue hope you reach out to me. I did bring some cards for all of you. Any issues that you have overall or questions about our operations or anything like that I hope you reach out to me any time. Thank you very much.
Mr. Winfree: Do you have anything? Mr. Kapish: Arey you talking to me? Mr. Winfree: Yes.
Mr. Kapish: I have a couple of things. The first thing is I guess, Skip I don’t know if you think that this is Board meeting. It is a public meeting. When you guys talk to us we need to be able to hear you, and you need to face us so we can hear your voice. Your voice is going sideways. I don’t know if you know that or not. You are not talking to them you are talking to us. That is how the public gets information. I know you have the Sunshine law and stuff like that. You are not very transparent so I guess you may not want people to know what is going on. When we had change orders or information that is not out there you need to put it up on the screen so the public can see what you guys are talking about. It is a public meeting. You are not there to talk to yourselves. This is a public meeting. Talk to the public. I guess from what I gather is that Skip the whole history of the District you are trying to put boats in the lake. If you are going to put boats in the lake it doesn’t matter what you put motorized or whatever the bottom line is it is very bad idea. The reason why the District doesn’t have boats in there is because you are worried about

people getting behind people’s home having boats in the lakes and the reason why we didn’t do that, and you should know this being on the Board for years is that the bottom line is the boats come out and someone falls in the lake you are opening the District to a liability. Anytime you do something new like that, and you have people out in boats, and somebody drowns out there guess who is going to be responsible to sue, the District. Right counsel? That is one of the reasons. Also, it causes damage. People leave stuff on the shore and everything else. If you are going to allow homeowners to do that then you basically are opening it up to the entire public. All these No Trespassing signs you are going to put up are meaningless because you just invited people back there to put boats in the lake. So, you can save yourself $15,000 by forgetting the No Trespassing signs. A couple other things here. The one flagpole over there Patrick by the entranceway where you replaced the other two the existing one is crooked. It probably should have been fixed when the other ones were out. If we have money for Christmas lights and we are going to do additional neighborhoods and stuff like this then you are sitting there talking with Skip about the Cadillac and the Volkswagen we are talking about liability. That is the main purpose of the District is to have those lakes and repair the lake banks. That is the most important thing. It is not Christmas lights. $8,000 over a ten-year period there is your $800,000 to repair the lakes. We have to be good students of the money, and I don’t see that here at all.
Mr. Burgess: Thank you, Chris. Mr. Winfree: Clarence?
Mr. Lohman: Just a quick update on the Foundation. I talked to you several times before with the commercial properties in Turtle Run. We have been in contact one way or another with every commercial property in Turtle Run. We are working on getting improvements to them. Some people stepped up and did a really good job. Buffalo Wild Wings, the Revel Gas Station, AutoZone, and anybody that has been in Walmart the last couple of days noticed that it is drastically different. They put a ton of landscaping in along the front of their building. It is substantially better. It took a little bit of effort. We are still working with some of the others. Some big ones to try to get all updated and up to what we think is our standards and Turtle Run standards.

Mr. Carney: If you haven’t driven through Walmart I recommend you do so. It is a big difference.
Mr. Lohman: That is it.
Ms. Rebecca: Hi, this is Rebecca from Cypress Pointe. I have just a quick comment. The only thing I want to comment on is I had noticed that at least one of the email addresses on the CDD site was not working. I know that Patrick was working on that. I just wanted to make sure that it has been resolved.
Mr. Burgess: It should have thank you. Ms. Rebecca: Thank you so much.
Mr. Carney: What was that Patrick I didn’t quite catch that.
Mr. Burgess: I think we had an old domain issue with the website email addresses for Supervisors. They took a look at it, and it should be resolved. I will double-check it.
Mr. Winfree: Alright, Supervisor requests.
THIRTEENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Supervisors Requests
Mr. Winfree: Skip do you have anything?
Mr. Carney: Yes I do. Patrick do you want to put those pictures up on the screen please?
Mr. Burgess: I can go through one by one.
Mr. Carney: Do the big one first. We were talking about Christmas decorations, and the District had a very nice Nativity Set of 22 pieces and would have been good for the next years but a unit for $50,000 was purchased from Arch Stone, LLC and it was like 12 pieces which are really enormous pieces. We made a decision between the Boards, the Foundation Board was to keep the newly purchased one at $50,000 and do something with it. Clarence has taken it upon himself to build the manger. He built bases of all the units. Patrick scroll through those please. Here is one of the pieces. This one is probably about 5 feet or 6 feet tall and weighs about 200 pounds. In order to move these things, you have to create bases for them. Clarence is storing them at the Foundation cost, but Clarence built all these bases in order to move them with a two-wheel and get them into location without cracking the bases of them. The initial investment was about $5,000 for material. The cost of making this CDI would have charged us anywhere from $10,000 to

$15,000 to make these things and Clarence did upon his time, so I applaud that. Thank you, Clarence. We really appreciate that.
Ms. Tropea: Thank you. Mr. Murray: Thank you.
Mr. Carney: So, we are talking about saving money on Christmas Designs well we could have saved $50,000 if this was never purchased. Just saying. I do have one more thing. When we put people on the Board we try to, at one time there was like 5 people form the Estates, we try to spread it around. We try to get people to run for the Board, nominated for the Board and now we have Hidden Lake, Newport, Cypress Pointe, the Estates and I think we have it pretty well balanced although we have two from the Estates. If that were to change we would look elsewhere. I recommend for all the new Board members to go back if you have bulletin boards or if you have websites post what the CDD is doing on your websites please. That is the whole item not just having input from those locations but to be able to go back to your constituents and show them what the CDD is doing and what your affiliation is with us. Let the entire Turtle Run know what the CDD Board is doing. Please do that. Other than that, I don’t have anything else thank you.
Mr. Winfree: Ginny? Ms. Tropea: Nothing. Mr. Winfree: Ken?
Mr. Murray: Nothing.
Mr. Winfree: I don’t have anything at this time either. With that said if no one else has anything can I get a motion to adjourn?

FOURTEENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS Adjournment

On MOTION by Mr. Carney seconded by Mr. Murray with all in favor, the meeting was adjourned.

	

Assistant Secretary/Secretary	Chairman/Vice Chairman